Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis-05.txt
Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com> Wed, 31 October 2012 14:55 UTC
Return-Path: <paitken@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736E221F8818 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.197, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DiP-0wLRk4oa for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1F021F8817 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=744; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1351695350; x=1352904950; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gnIjV/ETGYrTm0G1jYaoRkYyw1K6/japvYJC+/YG/9s=; b=amjQ4P4D1T5Sph2zDIk8DhkROHizkNa8fpOY39ytJMBAjYiSdCWB9mhl //wyan4m0ZU06WeoObC7bQqNRpm2B1xRWXUNbdBhqS+XnqzQ9zB7dV2mO ikH4eB4Xjmxivp4UToFr0aL/tH7DRoILoE0XewbxRsUhzstrzm/kmJbwM w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlIJALw6kVCQ/khN/2dsb2JhbABEwmIEBIECgQiCHgEBAQMBEgEKG0ABBQsLIRYPCQMCAQIBRQYNAQcBAR6HXgacIKAXkjMDlXaFaYhugWuCbw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,687,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="146079295"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 Oct 2012 14:55:48 +0000
Received: from [144.254.153.40] (dhcp-144-254-153-40.cisco.com [144.254.153.40]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9VEtl4v009415; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:55:47 GMT
Message-ID: <50913BF3.2080408@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:55:47 +0000
From: Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120912 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian Trammell <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
References: <506CBFE3.10607@auckland.ac.nz> <5090547C.5020803@cisco.com> <F37F4EC6-E7AB-4975-93A7-82B7CDCD13EF@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <5091271E.3050206@cisco.com> <68907E1B-1D38-4F3A-B0E0-F47628F989F0@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
In-Reply-To: <68907E1B-1D38-4F3A-B0E0-F47628F989F0@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Nevil Brownlee <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>, IPFIX Working Group <ipfix@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis-05.txt
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:55:51 -0000
Brian, > My inclination is we should define naming match as case-insensitive, since the intention is not to have these names used on the wire, and the only examples I can think of of collision are typographical in nature. +1. > How about: > > A delta counter counts only observations made since the last export of a Flow Record for a given Flow. That's back to my point that the observation might not be exported. More to the point, delta/total counting is a function of the MP. Whether the MP hands data to the EP, and what the EP does or does not do with that data, should have no bearing on how the MP meters subsequent data. So the definition should be purely in MP terms ("last export" being an EP term). P.
- [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-informa… Nevil Brownlee
- Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-inf… Paul Aitken
- [IPFIX] Removal of section 5 from RFC5102bis Brian Trammell
- Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-inf… Brian Trammell
- Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-inf… Paul Aitken
- Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-inf… Brian Trammell
- Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-inf… Paul Aitken
- Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-inf… Brian Trammell
- Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-inf… Paul Aitken
- Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-inf… Brian Trammell
- Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-inf… Paul Aitken
- Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-inf… Brian Trammell
- Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-inf… Gerhard Muenz
- Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-inf… Benoit Claise
- Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-inf… Benoit Claise
- Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-inf… Benoit Claise
- Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-inf… Paul Aitken