[IPFIX] errata filed http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5655.txt

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Sun, 19 April 2015 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40431A894E for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kKKIjfc81N-2 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 219AD1A893A for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mb-aye.local ([IPv6:2601:9:3402:7bb1:99b1:5e7f:7696:3880]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t3JIdGeM095266 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 18:39:16 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
To: IPFIX Working Group <ipfix@ietf.org>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
message-id: <5533F654.20103@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:39:16 -0700
user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0
mime-version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QpaXsjOJegj1HDdk2fa3rVN3bbJcNUOsF"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipfix/jdQyEQWUOEMYg4_GmtvEXiuGbfw>
Subject: [IPFIX] errata filed http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5655.txt
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 18:39:18 -0000

https://www.rfc-editor.org/verify_errata_select.php?eid=4308

what say you?


Status: Reported
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Paul Aitken
Date Reported: 2015-03-19
Section A.5 says:

A.5.  Complete File Example

   Bringing together the examples above and adding message headers as
   appropriate, a hex dump of the first 317 bytes of the example File
   constructed above would appear as in the annotated Figure 10 below.
It should say:

A.5.  Complete File Example

   Bringing together the examples above and adding message headers as
   appropriate, a hex dump of the first 285 bytes of the example File
   constructed above would appear as in the annotated Figure 10 below.
Notes:

s/317/285/

Figure 10 shows 18 lines of 16 octets each, less three octets in the
final row.
(18 x 16 - 3) = 285 octets.

This can also be confirmed by the revised numbering in errata 2030 -
though note that the dump is numbered from octet zero:

272: 80 02 00 50 06 00 00 46 50 00 00 00 41

Since the offset of the final octet ("41") is 284, the overall length
must be 285.