Re: [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5610 (4731)
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 06 July 2016 08:27 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7061F12D097 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 01:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.948
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i-dX82s7LVnA for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 01:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 416D812D169 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 01:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4703; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1467793617; x=1469003217; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PpRyHgbZqDx6r/K0K+kGUHK6wtmOAxyi9i7zjbr/qy0=; b=cOiNeZ8bF4/+olRtBisOCfPS20irVocNtGVCzbKtGuJ7taX5nsFluuPj 8zQP2puMVuXTY4T7TenIzTEP7Vrm4zKdMr80aIHT+plTl0cUzQhN1kR8A gurJtT1mzPlzixfE/XCXdlSxg7hE2f3IgOfZ2fzFWe5udyxLrvN/ch+79 A=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,318,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="678107015"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Jul 2016 08:26:55 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u668Qt4s008704; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 08:26:55 GMT
To: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20160706062440.C723CB80E00@rfc-editor.org> <F01C76E8-D82D-4D07-9C62-080A7E431DFD@trammell.ch>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <b9a683a0-254f-61bc-5102-6b57d4fca4fb@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 10:26:55 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F01C76E8-D82D-4D07-9C62-080A7E431DFD@trammell.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipfix/z-edM4OyLcTK3IXShog0n4F_D7Q>
Cc: "ipfix@ietf.org Group" <ipfix@ietf.org>, sb.logarajan@gmail.com, Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Nevil Brownlee <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5610 (4731)
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 08:27:00 -0000
On 7/6/2016 8:27 AM, Brian Trammell wrote: > (removing emails I know to be no longer functional) > >> On 06 Jul 2016, at 08:24, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: >> >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5610, >> "Exporting Type Information for IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Elements". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5610&eid=4731 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: Logarajan <sb.logarajan@gmail.com> >> >> Section: Appendix A >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> 1 2 3 >> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Set ID = 3 | Length = 26 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Template ID = 257 | Field Count = 4 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Scope Field Count = 2 |0| priv.EnterpriseNumber 346 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Field Length = 4 |0| informationElementId 303 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Field Length = 2 |0| inf.El.DataType 339 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Field Length = 1 |0| inf.El.Semantics 344 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Field Length = 1 |0| inf.El.Name 341 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Field Length = 65536 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> 1 2 3 >> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Set ID = 3 | Length = 26 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Template ID = 257 | Field Count = 5 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Scope Field Count = 2 |0| priv.EnterpriseNumber 346 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Field Length = 4 |0| informationElementId 303 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Field Length = 2 |0| inf.El.DataType 339 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Field Length = 1 |0| inf.El.Semantics 344 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Field Length = 1 |0| inf.El.Name 341 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Field Length = 65536 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> >> Notes >> ----- >> Field count should be 5. >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > Yes, this is correct. > > Also, Length = 26 should be Length = 30, since the length is consistent with the field count. (Do we need to file a new erratum for this?) No, I'll take care of updating this errata. Regards, B. > > Cheers, > > Brian > >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC5610 (draft-ietf-ipfix-exporting-type-05) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : Exporting Type Information for IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Elements >> Publication Date : July 2009 >> Author(s) : E. Boschi, B. Trammell, L. Mark, T. Zseby >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : IP Flow Information Export >> Area : Operations and Management >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG >> >> _______________________________________________ >> IPFIX mailing list >> IPFIX@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
- [IPFIX] [Errata Verified] RFC5610 (4731) RFC Errata System
- Re: [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5610 (… Benoit Claise
- [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5610 (4731) RFC Errata System
- Re: [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5610 (… Brian Trammell