Re: [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5610 (4731)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 06 July 2016 08:27 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7061F12D097 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 01:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.948
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i-dX82s7LVnA for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 01:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 416D812D169 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 01:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4703; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1467793617; x=1469003217; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PpRyHgbZqDx6r/K0K+kGUHK6wtmOAxyi9i7zjbr/qy0=; b=cOiNeZ8bF4/+olRtBisOCfPS20irVocNtGVCzbKtGuJ7taX5nsFluuPj 8zQP2puMVuXTY4T7TenIzTEP7Vrm4zKdMr80aIHT+plTl0cUzQhN1kR8A gurJtT1mzPlzixfE/XCXdlSxg7hE2f3IgOfZ2fzFWe5udyxLrvN/ch+79 A=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,318,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="678107015"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Jul 2016 08:26:55 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u668Qt4s008704; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 08:26:55 GMT
To: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20160706062440.C723CB80E00@rfc-editor.org> <F01C76E8-D82D-4D07-9C62-080A7E431DFD@trammell.ch>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <b9a683a0-254f-61bc-5102-6b57d4fca4fb@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 10:26:55 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F01C76E8-D82D-4D07-9C62-080A7E431DFD@trammell.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipfix/z-edM4OyLcTK3IXShog0n4F_D7Q>
Cc: "ipfix@ietf.org Group" <ipfix@ietf.org>, sb.logarajan@gmail.com, Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Nevil Brownlee <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5610 (4731)
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 08:27:00 -0000

On 7/6/2016 8:27 AM, Brian Trammell wrote:
> (removing emails I know to be no longer functional)
>
>> On 06 Jul 2016, at 08:24, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5610,
>> "Exporting Type Information for IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Elements".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5610&eid=4731
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: Logarajan <sb.logarajan@gmail.com>
>>
>> Section: Appendix A
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>>                      1                   2                   3
>>     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>    |          Set ID = 3           |          Length =  26         |
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>    |      Template ID = 257        |        Field Count = 4        |
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>    |    Scope Field Count = 2      |0| priv.EnterpriseNumber   346 |
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>    |       Field Length = 4        |0| informationElementId    303 |
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>    |       Field Length = 2        |0| inf.El.DataType         339 |
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>    |       Field Length = 1        |0| inf.El.Semantics        344 |
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>    |       Field Length = 1        |0| inf.El.Name             341 |
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>    |     Field Length = 65536      |
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>>                      1                   2                   3
>>     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>    |          Set ID = 3           |          Length =  26         |
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>    |      Template ID = 257        |        Field Count = 5        |
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>    |    Scope Field Count = 2      |0| priv.EnterpriseNumber   346 |
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>    |       Field Length = 4        |0| informationElementId    303 |
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>    |       Field Length = 2        |0| inf.El.DataType         339 |
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>    |       Field Length = 1        |0| inf.El.Semantics        344 |
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>    |       Field Length = 1        |0| inf.El.Name             341 |
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>    |     Field Length = 65536      |
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> Field count should be 5.
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> Yes, this is correct.
>
> Also, Length = 26 should be Length = 30, since the length is consistent with the field count. (Do we need to file a new erratum for this?)
No, I'll take care of updating this errata.

Regards, B.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Brian
>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC5610 (draft-ietf-ipfix-exporting-type-05)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Exporting Type Information for IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Elements
>> Publication Date    : July 2009
>> Author(s)           : E. Boschi, B. Trammell, L. Mark, T. Zseby
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : IP Flow Information Export
>> Area                : Operations and Management
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPFIX mailing list
>> IPFIX@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix