[IPFIX] originalFlowsPresent versus fsFlowRecordTotalCount

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 28 July 2011 06:04 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C0911E80B1 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.491
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.491 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.107, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MZbt1G--KIgw for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E8811E8070 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6S64mW7017782 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:04:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.86.251.97] (bxb-vpn3-865.cisco.com [10.86.251.97]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6S64huD023024 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:04:43 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E30FBFB.6050105@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 02:04:43 -0400
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "ipfix@ietf.org" <ipfix@ietf.org>
References: <4E30FB49.8030308@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E30FB49.8030308@cisco.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <4E30FB49.8030308@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000500090406030206000704"
Subject: [IPFIX] originalFlowsPresent versus fsFlowRecordTotalCount
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 06:04:50 -0000

Dear all,

Following on that thread, do we really two IEs for originalFlowsPresent 
versus fsFlowRecordTotalCount?
In other words, do we need different IEs for different Intermediate 
Functions?
Then why not originalFlowsPresentForAnonymization? You see where I'm 
going ;-)

Regards, Benoit.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-07
Date: 	Thu, 28 Jul 2011 02:01:45 -0400
From: 	Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: 	ipfix@ietf.org <ipfix@ietf.org>



Dear all,

Today, during the WG meeting, I had the action item to double-check the
IE id.
Basically, no problem with Write-up on that front.

 From that list, the TBD1 should be assigned the value 3, as specified
in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-01#section-3.1

                    +------+---------------------------+
                    | ID   | Name                      |
                    +------+---------------------------+
                    | TBD1 | fsFlowRecordTotalCount    |
                    +------+---------------------------+
                    | TBD2 | fsFlowRecordSelectedCount |
                    +------+---------------------------+
                    | TBD3 | fsPacketTotalCount        |
                    +------+---------------------------+
                    | TBD4 | fsPacketSelectedCount     |
                    +------+---------------------------+
                    | TBD5 | fsOctetTotalCount         |
                    +------+---------------------------+
                    | TBD6 | fsOctetSelectedCount      |
                    +------+---------------------------+

Not sure what the process is.
     - directly replace TBD1 by 3 in the draft
     - warn the IPFIX IANA expert, i.e. Nevil, that 3 should be assigned
     - something else?

Regards, Benoit.
_______________________________________________
IPFIX mailing list
IPFIX@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix