Re: Proposed changes to Draft Frame Relay MIB for multiprotocol support.

James Watt <james@ca.newbridge.com> Wed, 03 January 1996 22:25 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24524; 3 Jan 96 17:25 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24518; 3 Jan 96 17:25 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11300; 3 Jan 96 17:25 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24499; 3 Jan 96 17:25 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24494; 3 Jan 96 17:24 EST
Received: from ns.newbridge.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11277; 3 Jan 96 17:24 EST
Received: (from adm@localhost) by ns.newbridge.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id RAA20956; Wed, 3 Jan 1996 17:20:24 -0500
Received: from portero(192.75.23.66) by ns via smap (V1.3) id sma020941; Wed Jan 3 17:20:15 1996
Received: from thor.ca.newbridge.com (thor121.ca.newbridge.com [138.120.121.43]) by kanmaster.ca.newbridge.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA03155; Wed, 3 Jan 1996 17:20:14 -0500
Received: from fields.newbridge ([138.120.144.160]) by thor.ca.newbridge.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA07953; Wed, 3 Jan 1996 17:20:13 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iplpdn-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: James Watt <james@ca.newbridge.com>
Message-Id: <199601032220.RAA07953@thor.ca.newbridge.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed changes to Draft Frame Relay MIB for multiprotocol support.
To: Alan Bartky <alan@xylan.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 1996 17:20:12 -0500 (EST)
Cc: iplpdn@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, alan@xylan.com
In-Reply-To: <9601031622.AA05800@irvine.XYLAN.COM> from "Alan Bartky" at Jan 3, 96 08:22:31 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 769

Alan Bartky writes:

+---------
|Proposed change:
|
|     ifInUnknownProtos  Number of unknown or unsupported
|                        upper layer protocol frames received
|                        and discarded.  If only a single
|                        upper layer protocol is present
|                        (i.e. multiprotocol formatting is
|                        not used) then this counter
|                        would be always zero(0).
+---------
This looks useful.

I need to think more about the next one.

Regards,
-james
____________________________________________________________________________
James W. Watt,     james@newbridge.com                   Ph: +1 613 591-3600
Newbridge Networks 600 March Rd Kanata ON Canada K2K 2E6 FAX:+1 613 591-3680