Re: Questions on LOS ANGELES IETF and RFC status

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 22 January 1996 20:54 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14483; 22 Jan 96 15:54 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14479; 22 Jan 96 15:54 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16002; 22 Jan 96 15:54 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14436; 22 Jan 96 15:53 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14430; 22 Jan 96 15:51 EST
Received: from stilton.cisco.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15940; 22 Jan 96 15:51 EST
Received: from [171.69.128.114] (fred-mac-fr.cisco.com [171.69.128.114]) by stilton.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/8.6.5) with SMTP id MAA27178; Mon, 22 Jan 1996 12:51:07 -0800
X-Sender: fred@stilton.cisco.com
Message-Id: <v0213052cad29a4e097f5@[171.69.128.114]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 1996 12:51:10 -0800
To: Alan Bartky <alan@xylan.com>
X-Orig-Sender: iplpdn-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Questions on LOS ANGELES IETF and RFC status
Cc: iplpdn@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, alan@xylan.com

At 10:36 AM 1/19/96, Alan Bartky wrote:
>What is the possibility of getting the MIB published as
>an RFC and if so when could it be done by?

if we are all happy with Caralyn's latest draft, I (it somehow falls under
PPP's purview, don't ask me why) can forward it to the Area Director. Are
we all happy campers?

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Suppose you were an idiot.  And suppose you were a [politician].
But I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain