Re: comments from ken
Fred Baker <fbaker@acc.com> Fri, 12 March 1993 17:52 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05461; 12 Mar 93 12:52 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05457; 12 Mar 93 12:52 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13206; 12 Mar 93 12:52 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05443; 12 Mar 93 12:52 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05439; 12 Mar 93 12:49 EST
Received: from SAFFRON.ACC.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13146; 12 Mar 93 12:49 EST
Received: by saffron.acc.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA12113; Fri, 12 Mar 93 09:49:35 PST
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1993 09:49:35 -0800
X-Orig-Sender: iplpdn-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Fred Baker <fbaker@acc.com>
Message-Id: <9303121749.AA12113@saffron.acc.com>
To: cbrown@wellfleet.com
Subject: Re: comments from ken
Cc: iplpdn@nri.reston.va.us
thank you, Caralyn; I agree with Ken. The state should describe where the device or conversation is in its FSM, not where it has been in the past.
- Re: comments from ken Fred Baker