Re: Multicast in draft version 5 comments

Keith McCloghrie <kzm@cisco.com> Fri, 05 January 1996 08:31 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08503; 5 Jan 96 3:31 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08498; 5 Jan 96 3:31 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03320; 5 Jan 96 3:31 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08447; 5 Jan 96 3:31 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08443; 5 Jan 96 3:29 EST
Received: from foxhound.cisco.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03287; 5 Jan 96 3:29 EST
Received: (kzm@localhost) by foxhound.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/8.6.5) id AAA25074; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 00:28:30 -0800
X-Orig-Sender: iplpdn-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Keith McCloghrie <kzm@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <199601050828.AAA25074@foxhound.cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Multicast in draft version 5 comments
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 96 0:28:30 PST
Cc: kzm@cisco.com, iplpdn@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
In-Reply-To: <v0213050bad11d5f4ab8c@[171.69.128.114]>; from "Fred Baker" at Jan 4, 96 11:40 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]

> At 8:42 PM 1/3/96, Keith McCloghrie wrote:
> >Note that it is specified for usage when an instance is *created* via
> >SNMP.  Thus, DEFVAL is only appropriate when the MAX-ACCESS clause is
> >read-create.  For read-only/read-write objects, any mention of a default
> >value should go in the DESCRIPTION clause.
> 
> the point being, if there is a RowStatus variable, the objects should be
> read-create, not read-write. right?
 
Yes.

Keith.