Re: musings
Mike O'Dell <mo@uunet.uu.net> Fri, 17 May 1996 01:57 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa29679; 16 May 96 21:57 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa29675; 16 May 96 21:57 EDT
Received: from zephyr.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07766; 16 May 96 21:57 EDT
Received: by zephyr.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-23) id <AA18776>; Thu, 16 May 1996 18:44:18 -0700
Received: from venera.isi.edu by zephyr.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-23) id <AA18738>; Thu, 16 May 1996 18:44:12 -0700
Received: from rodan.UU.NET by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-23) id <AA29642>; Thu, 16 May 1996 18:44:10 -0700
Received: from localhost by rodan.UU.NET with SMTP (peer crosschecked as: mo@localhost) id QQaqag01205; Thu, 16 May 1996 21:44:09 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <QQaqag01205.199605170144@rodan.UU.NET>
To: braden@isi.edu
Cc: fred@cisco.com, rreq@isi.edu
Subject: Re: musings
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 16 May 1996 11:54:57 PDT." <9605161854.AA25129@can.isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 21:44:09 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Mike O'Dell <mo@uunet.uu.net>
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rreq@isi.edu
Precedence: bulk
the concept of "interoperable implementations of a requirements document" is curious to think about. there is no such thing as an "implementation" of a requirements spec. there can be an implementation of a system which is believed to meet the requirements in the spec, and that system could be interoperable with another system which claimed to meet the requirements, but "interoperability" has nothing to do with the spec in any real sense because that is a characteristic of the protocols in the system. so one can have good interoperability (PPP on cisco talks to PPP on 3com talks to PPP on Bay talks to PPP on Ascend etc etc) without any notion of whether the box completely satisfies the requirements. bottom line: the notion of "two interoperable implementations" as applied to requirements documents makes no sense in general. -mo
- Re: musings Fred Baker
- Re: musings braden
- Re: musings stev knowles
- Re: musings stev knowles
- Re: musings Fred Baker
- Re: musings William Chops Westfield
- Re: musings Craig Partridge
- Re: musings braden
- Re: musings Craig Partridge
- Re: musings Mike O'Dell
- Re: musings stev knowles
- Re: musings stev knowles
- Re: musings stev knowles
- Re: musings Louis A. Mamakos
- musings Dave Katz