Re: [NDP] Router autoconfiguration with RS/RA

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Sat, 07 June 2008 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ipngwg-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipngwg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376473A6AA6; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 08:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA93F3A6AA6 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 08:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.588
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kgu9aqY9xiDN for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 08:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail128.messagelabs.com (mail128.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C634C3A6AD0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 08:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-128.messagelabs.com!1212851290!3263121!1
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.12.14.2; banners=.,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.189.100.103]
Received: (qmail 27749 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2008 15:08:10 -0000
Received: from motgate3.mot.com (HELO motgate3.mot.com) (144.189.100.103) by server-6.tower-128.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 7 Jun 2008 15:08:10 -0000
Received: from az33exr03.mot.com (az33exr03.mot.com [10.64.251.233]) by motgate3.mot.com (8.12.11/Motorola) with ESMTP id m57F7wMd022595; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 08:08:03 -0700 (MST)
Received: from az10vts03 (az10vts03.mot.com [10.64.251.244]) by az33exr03.mot.com (8.13.1/Vontu) with SMTP id m57F7vXl022951; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 10:07:58 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mvp-10-31-24-37.am.mot.com [10.31.24.37]) by az33exr03.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id m57F7sNj022942; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 10:07:55 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <484AA448.7040701@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 17:07:52 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Subject: Re: [NDP] Router autoconfiguration with RS/RA
References: <3a44f430806060528o3ab46c73k863537e53e62275b@mail.gmail.com> <B00EDD615E3C5344B0FFCBA910CF7E1D04E41CDA@xmb-rtp-20e.amer.cisco.com> <4849A949.5060509@gmail.com> <2bbba3c10806061547u14bed193h8c10a76cbf04266a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2bbba3c10806061547u14bed193h8c10a76cbf04266a@mail.gmail.com>
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080607-0, 07/06/2008), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org

Ole Troan wrote:
> 2008/6/6 Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>:
>> Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
>>> Silviu,
>>> 
>>> A router can receive an RA on the router's upstream
>> Yes it can.  It uses it to report whether some things went wrong, 
>> log stuff, but don't act.
>> 
>>> and use this RA to autoconfigure the ipv6 address on interface(s)
>>>  of the router.
>> Usually no, it can not.  A particular case of a Mobile Router away 
>> from home can auto-configure an address on its egress interface 
>> with stateless autoconf.  But a non-mobile router (not implementing
>>  rfc3963) can't and it shouldn't.
>> 
>> A router is something that forwards packets.  A linux router can't
>>  auto-configure an address once one sets the forwarding=1.  A Cisco
>>  router I have doubts, but it doesn't mean it follows rfc.
> 
> a router can very well have an interface configured in host mode 
> where it uses normal host configuration mechanisms. [...] I don't see
>  any reason why it couldn't also do forwarding on this interface.

Ok, but what does the RFC say?  Can a non-mobile router configure one of 
its interface in host mode, auto-configure an address from received RA 
on it, and still forward packets to/from that interface?

> router/host mode is a per interface property.

Well, I don't think a non-mobile router can have any one of its 
interfaces in 'host' mode - once at least one interface is in host mode 
it will no longer forward packets between any of its other interfaces.

> and has been said before the RS/RA mechanism for router 
> discovery/prefix discovery does not support prefix delegation.

Right...

> of course you can invent a new protocol using RS/RA messages to do 
> it, but I haven't seen any convincing reason why we should.

I agree.

> note that the DHCP PD was triggered by a draft proposing using ICMP
> for PD. we suggested using DHCP instead, since one eventually would
> have reinvented lots of the DHCP machinery to make it work.

A-ha.

Alex


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------