RE: End System PMTUD behavior question
"Dunn, Jeffrey H." <jdunn@mitre.org> Wed, 21 January 2009 22:24 UTC
Return-Path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ipngwg-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipngwg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E18D28C13A; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:24:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D27728C10A; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:24:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.114
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.114 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.485, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wOrjcGWaQTZ9; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:24:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-bedford.mitre.org (smtp-bedford.mitre.org [129.83.20.191]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D8D28C13A; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:24:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-bedford.mitre.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-bedford.mitre.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n0LMOMuG001087; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:24:22 -0500
Received: from imchub2.MITRE.ORG (imchub2.mitre.org [129.83.29.74]) by smtp-bedford.mitre.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n0LMOK0W000934; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:24:20 -0500
Received: from IMCMBX1.MITRE.ORG ([129.83.29.204]) by imchub2.MITRE.ORG ([129.83.29.74]) with mapi; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:24:20 -0500
From: "Dunn, Jeffrey H." <jdunn@mitre.org>
To: Thomas Peterson <thomasp@iol.unh.edu>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:24:18 -0500
Subject: RE: End System PMTUD behavior question
Thread-Topic: End System PMTUD behavior question
Thread-Index: Acl8AumHvABBPVEsRNuqz40l5WxhqwAE/RWA
Message-ID: <3C6F21684E7C954193E6C7C4573B762701D3DD69D1@IMCMBX1.MITRE.ORG>
References: <3C6F21684E7C954193E6C7C4573B762701D3DD67DA@IMCMBX1.MITRE.ORG> <200901212133.30109.rdenis@simphalempin.com> <3C6F21684E7C954193E6C7C4573B762701D3DD687B@IMCMBX1.MITRE.ORG> <42A4D5E1-C552-434C-90E3-DA3EF4A78688@iol.unh.edu>
In-Reply-To: <42A4D5E1-C552-434C-90E3-DA3EF4A78688@iol.unh.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "ipv6-bounces@ietf.org" <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>, "Liou, Chern" <csliou@mitre.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "Sherman, Kurt T." <ksherman@mitre.org>, "steve_eiserman@uscourts.gov" <steve_eiserman@uscourts.gov>, "Huang, Frank" <fhuang@mitre.org>, "v6ops@ops.ietf.org" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, "Grayeli, Parisa" <pgrayeli@mitre.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Thomas,
We would be happy to see any results you may have concerning application behavior during PMTUD. Best Regards, Jeffrey Dunn Info Systems Eng., Lead MITRE Corporation. (301) 448-6965 (mobile) -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Peterson [mailto:thomasp@iol.unh.edu] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 3:00 PM To: Dunn, Jeffrey H. Cc: Rémi Denis-Courmont; ipv6@ietf.org; Huang, Frank; Sherman, Kurt T.; Liou, Chern; steve_eiserman@uscourts.gov; ipv6-bounces@ietf.org; v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Grayeli, Parisa Subject: Re: End System PMTUD behavior question Hi Jeffrey, This is Thomas Peterson from the InterOperability Laboratory at UNH. We have done extensive testing in this area and would be happy to work with you off line to examine this scenario. If you would like we can even set up your test topology in our lab. Thanks, Tom On Jan 21, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Dunn, Jeffrey H. wrote: > Rémi, > > I agree with you assertions concerning "ping" versus TCP; however, I > am looking for some concrete documentation or experiences. > > Best Regards, > > Jeffrey Dunn > Info Systems Eng., Lead > MITRE Corporation. > (301) 448-6965 (mobile) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rémi Denis-Courmont [mailto:rdenis@simphalempin.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 2:33 PM > To: ipv6@ietf.org > Cc: Dunn, Jeffrey H.; ipv6-bounces@ietf.org; v6ops@ops.ietf.org; > Sherman, Kurt T.; Liou, Chern; steve_eiserman@uscourts.gov; Huang, > Frank; Grayeli, Parisa > Subject: Re: End System PMTUD behavior question > > Le mercredi 21 janvier 2009 20:56:23 Dunn, Jeffrey H., vous avez > écrit : >> Colleagues, >> >> We have been performing some PMTUD tests and have found that >> different >> operating systems handle PMTUD differently. Specifically, we found >> that the >> "ping" application behaves in the following way when the PMTU is >> set to >> 1280 and a 1500 octet ICMPv6 echo request is sent to that routed >> path. The >> hosts we tested: > > I'm afraid ping applications are not representative of what the > operating > system IP stacks do. Besides, there are no standards regarding the > behavior > of "ping" in case of Path MTU problems; it's really up to the > implementor of > each "ping" whether to report an error or to transparently fragment. > > > The behavior of real transport protocols, such as TCP, DCCP and SCTP > is more > interesting when it comes to evaluating operating systems and their IP > stacks. > > -- > Rémi Denis-Courmont > http://www.remlab.net/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- End System PMTUD behavior question Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- Re: End System PMTUD behavior question Rémi Denis-Courmont
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- Re: End System PMTUD behavior question Thomas Peterson
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- Re: End System PMTUD behavior question Thomas Peterson
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Peter.Hunt
- Re: End System PMTUD behavior question Mark Andrews
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- Re: End System PMTUD behavior question Mark Andrews
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Pekka Savola
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- Re: End System PMTUD behavior question Thomas Peterson