Re: [NDP] Router autoconfiguration with RS/RA
Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 06 June 2008 21:17 UTC
Return-Path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ipngwg-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipngwg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193B83A68B7; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AC23A68B7 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.586
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.586 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z-gq3TXupkh3 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail119.messagelabs.com (mail119.messagelabs.com [216.82.245.51]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DBA863A67AD for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-119.messagelabs.com!1212787024!22151314!1
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.12.14.2; banners=.,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.189.100.101]
Received: (qmail 7251 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2008 21:17:05 -0000
Received: from motgate2.mot.com (HELO motgate2.mot.com) (144.189.100.101) by server-7.tower-119.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 6 Jun 2008 21:17:05 -0000
Received: from az33exr01.mot.com (az33exr01.mot.com [10.64.251.231]) by motgate2.mot.com (8.12.11/Motorola) with ESMTP id m56LH4Wn009070; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:17:04 -0700 (MST)
Received: from az10vts03 (az10vts03.mot.com [10.64.251.244]) by az33exr01.mot.com (8.13.1/Vontu) with SMTP id m56LH3vs020046; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:17:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.129.40.2]) by az33exr01.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id m56LGvFu019952; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:17:02 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4849A949.5060509@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:16:57 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [NDP] Router autoconfiguration with RS/RA
References: <3a44f430806060528o3ab46c73k863537e53e62275b@mail.gmail.com> <B00EDD615E3C5344B0FFCBA910CF7E1D04E41CDA@xmb-rtp-20e.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <B00EDD615E3C5344B0FFCBA910CF7E1D04E41CDA@xmb-rtp-20e.amer.cisco.com>
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080605-1, 05/06/2008), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote: > Silviu, > > A router can receive an RA on the router's upstream Yes it can. It uses it to report whether some things went wrong, log stuff, but don't act. > and use this RA to autoconfigure the ipv6 address on interface(s) of > the router. Usually no, it can not. A particular case of a Mobile Router away from home can auto-configure an address on its egress interface with stateless autoconf. But a non-mobile router (not implementing rfc3963) can't and it shouldn't. A router is something that forwards packets. A linux router can't auto-configure an address once one sets the forwarding=1. A Cisco router I have doubts, but it doesn't mean it follows rfc. > Such a router interface configuration is no different from how a host > interface statelessly autoconfigures as per ND RFC 4861 and 4862. > However, ND RFC's do not mandate what does a router implementation do > for sending RA, configuring network prefixes in the router > downstream direction - these are conceptual variables that a router > vendor is left to do what they want to do. Not sure what you mean left to vendors? there are some precisely defined corner cases for configuring routers downstreams like DHCPv6-PD followed eventually by Router Renumbering. And, in most cases, assigning addresses to routers is part of a network planning procedure performed by humans on paper, designed and redesigned before being deployed; some call it architecting the network. That's a good reason for manually (or via SNMP, or other proprietary tool) to configure addresses on routers, and not with stateless autoconf. > > As to answering your question which was: > > "Why wouldn't a router be authorized to send Router Sollicitation > messages?" > > here is my reply. > > As far as the interface on the router has no RA configured, and the > interface is configuring an IPv6 address using stateless > autoconfiguration or even manual configuration, this interface is OK > to send an RS in the router downstream. However, soon as any RA > configuration for router downstream is configured on the network > interface, then ND prohibits a router to send any RS. > > Furthermore, I totally agree with Remi on his reply to this question > of yours: > > "The same question for autoconfiguring the prefix it advertises on > its subnets." > > You cannot mix router upstream and downstream operations in random > fashion. IPv6 stateless autoconfiguration does not support prefix and > router configuration of an upstream router. One should be careful > discussing router downstream vs. router upstream directions for > address configuration, routing configuration, and IPv6 ND RA > configuration. Well I wouldn't even talk upstream/downstream, just routers and maybe default-free routers are very special. Alex ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- [NDP] Router autoconfiguration with RS/RA Silviu VLASCEANU
- Re: [NDP] Router autoconfiguration with RS/RA Remi Denis-Courmont
- Re: [NDP] Router autoconfiguration with RS/RA Remi Denis-Courmont
- RE: [NDP] Router autoconfiguration with RS/RA Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [NDP] Router autoconfiguration with RS/RA Silviu VLASCEANU
- Re: [NDP] Router autoconfiguration with RS/RA Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [NDP] Router autoconfiguration with RS/RA Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [NDP] Router autoconfiguration with RS/RA Ole Troan
- Re: [NDP] Router autoconfiguration with RS/RA Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [NDP] Router autoconfiguration with RS/RA Shin Miyakawa
- RE: [NDP] Router autoconfiguration with RS/RA Hemant Singh (shemant)