Re: Standard status of RFC 3879
Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> Thu, 22 January 2009 11:10 UTC
Return-Path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ipngwg-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipngwg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B1D3A69EB; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:10:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80ACE3A692E for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:10:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VBlWSp78Nr0z for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:10:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netcore.fi (eunet-gw.ipv6.netcore.fi [IPv6:2001:670:86:3001::1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371D83A69EB for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:10:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netcore.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netcore.fi (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0MBAC1V029734; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:10:12 +0200
Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id n0MBAA1O029730; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:10:11 +0200
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:10:10 +0200
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Standard status of RFC 3879
In-Reply-To: <49778604.4010703@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0901221308080.29459@netcore.fi>
References: <8EFB68EAE061884A8517F2A755E8B60A19D3AB6593@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <E5653CB3-3296-4E32-BD83-658EE8343DC5@nokia.com> <8EFB68EAE061884A8517F2A755E8B60A19D3AB6792@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <alpine.LRH.2.00.0901212131170.5113@netcore.fi> <49778604.4010703@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LRH 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on otso.netcore.fi
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>, "bob.hinden@nokia.com" <bob.hinden@nokia.com>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Well, I think Christian's point is valid. There are still text books that > list site-local as valid, and in my XP box I find: > > DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 130.216.xx.xxx > 130.216.xx.xxx > fec0:0:0:ffff::1%2 > fec0:0:0:ffff::2%2 > fec0:0:0:ffff::3%2 > > I think that simply reclassifying 3879 as DS would be a Good Thing > and requires minimal effort. FWIW, I see this more as evidence that site-local deprecation hasn't been as successful as we could hope. Putting 3879 to AS doesn't fix above. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Standard status of RFC 3879 Christian Huitema
- Re: Standard status of RFC 3879 Bob Hinden
- RE: Standard status of RFC 3879 Christian Huitema
- RE: Standard status of RFC 3879 Pekka Savola
- Re: Standard status of RFC 3879 Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: Standard status of RFC 3879 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Standard status of RFC 3879 Pekka Savola