RE: End System PMTUD behavior question
"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> Wed, 21 January 2009 20:36 UTC
Return-Path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ipngwg-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipngwg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643A43A6A70; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:36:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA7393A69ED; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:36:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.702, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PCyDela959Db; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:36:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010323A6937; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:36:22 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,302,1231113600"; d="scan'208";a="131838859"
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2009 20:36:06 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n0LKa6cY001366; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:36:06 -0800
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0LKa5if013425; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:36:06 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-20e.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.40]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:36:05 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: End System PMTUD behavior question
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:35:16 -0500
Message-ID: <B00EDD615E3C5344B0FFCBA910CF7E1D0632C176@xmb-rtp-20e.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C6F21684E7C954193E6C7C4573B762701D3DD67DA@IMCMBX1.MITRE.ORG>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: End System PMTUD behavior question
Thread-Index: Acl7+fSDtCRQmHdATNy7UebOW+92QAACmYbg
References: <3C6F21684E7C954193E6C7C4573B762701D3DD67DA@IMCMBX1.MITRE.ORG>
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
To: "Dunn, Jeffrey H." <jdunn@mitre.org>, ipv6-bounces@ietf.org, v6ops@ops.ietf.org, 6man mailing list <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jan 2009 20:36:05.0501 (UTC) FILETIME=[E1FF9AD0:01C97C07]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1348; t=1232570166; x=1233434166; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=shemant@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Hemant=20Singh=20(shemant)=22=20<shemant@cisco. com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20End=20System=20PMTUD=20behavior=20quest ion |Sender:=20; bh=5VcY43xFzxCP+Hg7gwu5fG4zFKyh0ND6GiJqnqyBUCQ=; b=ufrza3ekF5veDe40jDmKro5mNoqsul7uTdtRW1mnudt9p3uDb8T1CTQbcs T9inGJTB9tpgGb9wVlX4+9ISk+Hmn2HZScEUBWPvuc1qQ11fP1H5/bUcdt+m NyecpZ9oN6;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=shemant@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
Cc: "Huang, Frank" <fhuang@mitre.org>, "Sherman, Kurt T." <ksherman@mitre.org>, "Grayeli, Parisa" <pgrayeli@mitre.org>, "Liou, Chern" <csliou@mitre.org>, steve_eiserman@uscourts.gov
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org > The following questions occurred to us:
> 1. Should the hosts re-transmit the ICMPv6 echo request(s) in fragments? If the ICMPv6 echo reqs were being used for PMTUD, the answer should be a No. The host just received an Indication of Too Big that also said the PMTU is 1280, so the host should be sending any subsequent packets keeping PMTU of 1280 in mind without have to fragment. Then my question is, if ICMPv6 is not being used for PMTUD, then for what purpose is ICMPv6 being used such that an ICMPv6 req of 1500 is needed when a req of size 1280 can be sent? > 2. If not, should the host that sent two echo requests have waited for a response in support of PMTUD? PMTUD does recommend a host send a probe and wait for a timeout interval before sending another probe. The RFCs recommend five times larger timeout value that the normal timeout of the protocol/app being used to probe. So, say, the ICMPv6 timeout being used in your test is 2 secs, then the host should wait for 10 secs for a reply. See RFC 4821 for timeout recommendations for how long to wait for a probe reply. In your test case, I have got to believe, the Too Big error reached the host in 10 secs of sending the ICMPv6 req - the first hop router is most likely to catch the Too Big condition and respond to the probe. Hemant -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- End System PMTUD behavior question Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- Re: End System PMTUD behavior question RĂ©mi Denis-Courmont
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- Re: End System PMTUD behavior question Thomas Peterson
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- Re: End System PMTUD behavior question Thomas Peterson
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Hemant Singh (shemant)
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Peter.Hunt
- Re: End System PMTUD behavior question Mark Andrews
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- Re: End System PMTUD behavior question Mark Andrews
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Pekka Savola
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- RE: End System PMTUD behavior question Dunn, Jeffrey H.
- Re: End System PMTUD behavior question Thomas Peterson