Re: [IPP] What value do IPP Printers provide for "printer-name"?

Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> Tue, 11 June 2024 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21429C1CAF41 for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_FAIL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pwg.org header.b="GQtducCf"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pwg.org header.b="NYhhKs+l"; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=msweet.org header.b="p3lYCNiY"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UXW4Um6MXNsZ for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (mail.pwg.org [172.104.19.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1D9C14F60B for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id E6FF2C86B; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:08:51 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org E6FF2C86B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pwg.org; s=default; t=1718132931; bh=d0u1bse55QIDmo17eNnMFgHT6hHf2ALao/+E1OKGx8g=; h=In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=GQtducCfrmyzdyBvFSDw/fmjTAS/mb7naGut0cFV3R3fVg5acEIEW36Ho9DOVOBei CQVEzevnOyFW1/SyRXrpSw//It9ntV9MDuC/DrHopPJR/KA4WsMUHuvP1lPFw11rkF m3Jbk6/lg0QA3cQE5/oYACESSoW1x29It4PbzHTw=
Received: from mail.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DED421E6; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:08:50 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org 9DED421E6
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pwg.org; s=default; t=1718132930; bh=d0u1bse55QIDmo17eNnMFgHT6hHf2ALao/+E1OKGx8g=; h=In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=NYhhKs+luVju86PEfjFbWv9S7RCA6XN4X87GEzAtWN8wvwerZjB2hxenBR4S58O7U N0tYsDYkFup4SMqlsMcU3nr2+i25m3VOTj2duMVY+WFPEogu3lWUmyPMd9hxexwGqX edeJiVy2Ykq2PD0wx/Zn/RJHpTMPdbvLCqGTDVyY=
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 334423A77; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:08:49 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org 334423A77
Authentication-Results: mail.pwg.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=msweet.org header.i=@msweet.org header.b="p3lYCNiY"
Received: from mail.msweet.org (mail.msweet.org [173.255.209.91]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5956C33AB for <ipp@pwg.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:08:48 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org 5956C33AB
Received: from smtpclient.apple (cbl-66-186-76-47.vianet.ca [66.186.76.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.msweet.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A75AC80E52; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:08:46 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.msweet.org A75AC80E52
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=msweet.org; s=default; t=1718132927; bh=JXtXL1S9Yb3bieEPhUfdnmzg3G0bkaYz62/s9Q8fSEw=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=p3lYCNiYLgoVZOiEX+Qty5KPWgKARO+y+pL42s28qHdINSCRNVcUTG56e5S1q/YIo FZ79Ep5njaKzVsAdFj9AsXws5p41bpDOrqr/2SqXFJn1s7bjKpI/Yy7u/6MMqS5x/8 Lwx9oTNtIJ2fqwEkdnM9NKWXQiDaq7f7M2qTEvbA=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\))
In-Reply-To: <4D8663F2-82C6-45D5-879C-7282F9587884@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 15:08:35 -0400
Message-Id: <12C5EF2E-27DF-4C55-9352-5858DD84D60E@msweet.org>
References: <4D8663F2-82C6-45D5-879C-7282F9587884@hp.com>
To: PWG IPP Workgroup <ipp@pwg.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.600.62)
Subject: Re: [IPP] What value do IPP Printers provide for "printer-name"?
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
From: Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org>
Reply-To: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp@pwg.org>
Cc: Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8167196255414129050=="
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>

Smith,

I did a quick check of the printers in my home lab:

    ippfind --exec ipptool -tv '{}' get-printer-attributes.test \; | grep printer-name

and while the HP printers do indeed put the hostname in there (uppercased) all of the rest seem to put the model name or make and model. CUPS and PAPPL use the local queue name which is usually some variation of make and/or model (but users can change that...)


> On Jun 11, 2024, at 3:03 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> Just doing an informal survey for printer vendors: What value do your printers provide for the "printer-name" attribute (RFC 8011)?
> 
> HP provides the hostname.
> 
> Do client vendors expect this to be the hostname, or do they have no expectations?
> 
> Thanks for any replies,
> 
> Smith
> 
> /**
>    Smith Kennedy
>    HP Inc.
> */
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp@pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
> 

________________________
Michael Sweet

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp@pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp