[IPP] Fwd: Xerox has reviewed the IPP System Service v1.0 and has comments
Ira McDonald via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> Fri, 13 September 2019 00:56 UTC
Return-Path: <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E68D1200B1 for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 17:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.688
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IZ8CwigffQft for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 17:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (mail.pwg.org [50.116.7.199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954DE1200B4 for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 17:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 336227E6F; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:56:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD33269F; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:56:22 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 6DF7B4F24; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:56:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92c.google.com (mail-ua1-x92c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92c]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EF852645 for <ipp@pwg.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:56:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92c.google.com with SMTP id f25so8657298uap.1 for <ipp@pwg.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 17:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ptzZuVQjcrc34EX0HMvIiwcIAYqRHXR5W9WDjZnHGwI=; b=cuezRU8xGieTS4e+o1YyctUoCl8wP4vf2S7kJ/u61HqdAjTsAsZRoVfdxdOTOoJs26 cFugBcF21JZ53Mm3ABUBxx4pC6vtUtzTaxbF2eyj8JLIcgt1PIiR2IOaMdFiI0/hlFMO H9x3ke67sFqdB78PHDsuJqXnGXl7od29E+7wF8Zq1GyJr0uh06Ku9WNugKXv+sJ6LHTy E6H9wuILr+CVmSZvwRYQrUgOQ9j75OEyNQiLjLpfeTCvIffZAuDZ5We7SmAn0pI05TJ3 sBAsdbh8r88fEP+24XHIv39PIvDq6Yl2pyde3zgTHxkpX1Ur6aQuEVUAnYvNribcZHuy 2p8w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ptzZuVQjcrc34EX0HMvIiwcIAYqRHXR5W9WDjZnHGwI=; b=ky9roSCnQrEEul4OiKz0/BepWP0vl21Er0fbaJ9/Gf+pJuZaMH2P/AAmD3GFLu9hUS JDAGkDOFwD2py7lyhoMbJmPh//X1gK1rO/jjMjSazYJMWl8BmLJUuNJTj/CsKBhfBgoT ORNnk8ah0OqLipiEL3swN37HVDH5N1hJ1KN9Uum6YN/XElnLlj2Oau3BB2i/Sv2D4/hz dQzq0NDJ+T7rfQiYFOojJo2DYdSqW3iJcawKyNwIr7vShjPh1SNNZzJGUja1hqs3iwkU ZiBEMQmdrLQU4T0ajMXno9HIwP84nik/QdXqH3xB5mCkXCXl5GeBtC8WsgfJz7rHboGw iczQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUmTPmXwwYGAQoUknAWn1JDyyHXoX9POdf4NMShmt3K9kjc5Dbt kqh1UvN2tTyPqygpbo760ngKdVDtZ2uIhsN6/mxRJQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzr4gIznX81bq8eMtzQC+uuD1L7qjS5tyHj8XolMhd4h3EqfOk/clkmpbjxom8JuQ283Hh6FX5dye+T91gSWuw=
X-Received: by 2002:a9f:3110:: with SMTP id m16mr17622062uab.10.1568336179154; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 17:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <SN6PR11MB2639EB0069F7E0B625B578F2EFB10@SN6PR11MB2639.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR11MB2639EB0069F7E0B625B578F2EFB10@SN6PR11MB2639.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 20:56:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CAN40gSv+AnMn7t7o=K8LnMONZgZ4969AvPN1wsBxeJXUK9cwxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "ipp@pwg.org" <ipp@pwg.org>
Subject: [IPP] Fwd: Xerox has reviewed the IPP System Service v1.0 and has comments
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
From: Ira McDonald via ipp <ipp@pwg.org>
Reply-To: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6887599371173818181=="
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
Forwarding to IPP list for open record ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Sukert, Alan <Alan.Sukert@xerox.com> Date: Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:52 AM Subject: Xerox has reviewed the IPP System Service v1.0 and has comments To: ipp@pwg.org <ipp@pwg.org>, Ira McDonald (blueroofmusic@gmail.com) < blueroofmusic@gmail.com>, Paul Tykodi <ptykodi@tykodi.com>, Michael Sweet < msweet@msweet.org> Cc: Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architect) <smith.kennedy@hp.com> The following are my comments against IPP System Service v1.0: 1. The [ACPI] reference in 15.1 does not appear elsewhere in the document. 2. The [DSP1027] reference in 15.1 does not appear elsewhere in the document. 3. The [IEEE1284] reference in 15.1 does not appear elsewhere in the document. 4. The [IEEE1621] reference in 15.1 does not appear elsewhere in the document. 5. The [ISO10175-1] reference in 15.1 does not appear elsewhere in the document. 6. The [PWG5100.1] reference in 15.1 does not appear elsewhere in the document. The text does reference [PWG5100.11], so I wonder if the reference in 15.1 is incorrect. 7. The [PWG5107.2] reference in 15.1 does not appear elsewhere in the document. Also, the associated link for this reference in 15.1 does not work. 8. The [STD66] reference in 15.1 does not appear elsewhere in the document. 9. For the [STD92] reference in 15.1, the link may be to the proper document but it doesn’t track with the title in 15.1. 15.1 lists "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1", STD 92, June 2018” but the document the link points to has “*Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Encoding and Transport”, is dated January 2017 and is not labeled STD92.* 10. [ISO10646] is mentioned in Section 12 but is not listed in any of the reference sections in 15. 11. [PWG5100.SYS] is mentioned in Section 14 but is not listed in any of the reference sections in 15. 12. Not sure this is an issue or not, but I couldn’t reach the link for the [REJUVENATION] reference in 15.2. 13. This one is a nit – For the [UNISECFAQ] reference in 15.2, the title in 15.2 says “Unicode Consortium “Unicode Security FAQ”, November2016” but the actual title in the referenced link is “Unicode Consortium “Unicode Security Issues FAQ”, November2016”. 14. This may be OK, but in 2.4 on line 517 the https://www.iso.org/standard/18191.html link takes you to *ISO/IEC 10175-1:1996*. Is that the document you wanted to point to here? I checked all the references in Section 15 but didn’t check if all the references in the body of the document were listed in Section 15; I will try to do that later if I can get some spare time. Alan Sukert Product Security Specialist Xerox Research and Development/ Product Security and Development Process Controls Xerox Certified Green Belt Alan.Sukert@xerox.com| tel 585.427.1413 MS 0111-03A | 800 Phillips Road | Webster, NY 14580 USA
_______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
- Re: [IPP] Xerox has reviewed the IPP System Servi… Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architect) via ipp
- [IPP] Fwd: Xerox has reviewed the IPP System Serv… Ira McDonald via ipp