IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPP] What value do IPP Printers provide for "printer-name"?

Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> Tue, 11 June 2024 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411EBC151552 for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_FAIL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pwg.org header.b="HKju3o/j"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pwg.org header.b="N7RLg86x"; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=msweet.org header.b="NWIEHPMp"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8j0X5rizu_gb for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (mail.pwg.org [172.104.19.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F93C151524 for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 05471CE3A; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:46:00 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org 05471CE3A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pwg.org; s=default; t=1718135160; bh=qIqBzVBXk3L0LHRFc63VuzGw6GKeroZsT4mKDo5P6PE=; h=In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=HKju3o/jeatMxyGQSccYzKyr+HVh0bEIzGWC3ZAwwEyyw7q4u170R/VloSnDhMFxR /0PKAq8yyaBEuo2t/zSK5L2gJClv9uUsSP5/nEvSicm8kqZI8mfBdvr6OxHW9NLgJ8 viV99+9s8otOZBcoOB9ikHUVymdIpIwQC+r8M/qQ=
Received: from mail.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9076A21E6; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:45:58 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org 9076A21E6
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pwg.org; s=default; t=1718135158; bh=qIqBzVBXk3L0LHRFc63VuzGw6GKeroZsT4mKDo5P6PE=; h=In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=N7RLg86xr5acFQ+84Xl9HJQ+Qlh9uKa1Ecnf0t1AZjC+zwOP76TTh4eKSBqsYiIhS BiEkF2xihhS1KWk7KezJsyzwsZYebw8VERi8Ag5wnBP+C6Qepjv5i3NbhbAQRwD0W2 e9NON6cUT9IwZx3PawV2pSGpW2vvq7CuUpafB3s0=
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 9A9BB3ACA; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:45:56 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org 9A9BB3ACA
Authentication-Results: mail.pwg.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=msweet.org header.i=@msweet.org header.b="NWIEHPMp"
Received: from mail.msweet.org (mail.msweet.org [173.255.209.91]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD56733AB for <ipp@pwg.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:45:55 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org BD56733AB
Received: from smtpclient.apple (cbl-66-186-76-47.vianet.ca [66.186.76.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.msweet.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1591B80E52; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:45:53 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.msweet.org 1591B80E52
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=msweet.org; s=default; t=1718135154; bh=lXclhlagCB8QG6pdqm3I9af1L/sOYu3tAsuG55tX5Tg=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=NWIEHPMpRMkPy0A15osT7MzbMt68UY/GbOPuQNeuOU3wkirwlmEWV9dI6g8HuJ9GB NZkdCTlpRykMXqOgBiLamFxbVvoPS39tJflsznfMCF8MeXUuuDS4N+4EqWr3HNL788 hueIAutHsTLwRwXc9NdR1nHhWYiujCzwE3lbHt9Q=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\))
In-Reply-To: <541C3F9B-0DB5-4880-87BF-9BB1DBB81F46@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 15:45:42 -0400
Message-Id: <826064B5-8388-4292-81A1-72059D2426A0@msweet.org>
References: <4D8663F2-82C6-45D5-879C-7282F9587884@hp.com> <12C5EF2E-27DF-4C55-9352-5858DD84D60E@msweet.org> <541C3F9B-0DB5-4880-87BF-9BB1DBB81F46@hp.com>
To: "Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards)" <smith.kennedy@hp.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.600.62)
Subject: Re: [IPP] What value do IPP Printers provide for "printer-name"?
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
From: Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org>
Reply-To: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp@pwg.org>
Cc: Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>, PWG IPP Workgroup <ipp@pwg.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2405338962482122002=="
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>

Smith,

> On Jun 11, 2024, at 3:22 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <smith.kennedy@hp.com> wrote:
> ...
> So the attributes involved in a discussion were:
> 
> printer-name (RFC 2911 / 8011 - required)
> printer-make-and-model (RFC 2911 / 8011 - recommended)
> printer-dns-sd-name (PWG 5100.13 - required)
> 
> The wording of "printer-name" makes it sound like it should be a unique name, not a model name...

A printer by any other name would smell as sweet?

From RFC 8011, "printer-name" is *not* a unique name, just a more friendly one:

    5.4.4.  printer-name (name(127))

       This REQUIRED Printer attribute contains the name of the Printer.  It
       is a name that is more End User friendly than a URI.  An
       Administrator determines a Printer's name and sets this attribute to
       that name.  This name can be the last part of the Printer's URI, or
       it can be unrelated.  In non-US-English locales, a name can contain
       characters that are not allowed in a URI.

________________________
Michael Sweet


_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp@pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status