Re: [IPP] Adding a section 3.5 "Design Requirements" to IPP Authentication Methods

Hi,

Looks fine to me with Mike's suggested edits.

Cheers,
- Ira

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic@gmail.com
PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434

On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:21 AM Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards
Architect) via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> wrote:

> I like it!
>
> Unless there are any other suggestions, I'm going to run with that, and
> post an updated document later this morning.
>
> Smith
>
>
>
> On Jul 1, 2019, at 6:49 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org> wrote:
>
> Smith,
>
> Quick feedback:
>
> - End initial sentence with "are to:" (add "to")?
> - Item 1: "currently defined for IPP" is awkward
> - Add "and" at the end of item 1.
> - Item 2: "Describe implementation considerations for authentication ..."
> (identification has already happened, you are describing the items that
> were identified during the development of the document)
> - Item 2: "protocol technical concerns" should read "technical protocol
> concerns"
>
> That would make it:
>
> 3.5 Design Requirements
>
> The design requirements for this IPP Authentication Methods Best Practice
> document are to:
>
> 1. Illustrate how each authentication method integrates into IPP
> interaction flows; and
> 2. Describe implementation considerations for authentication in general,
> including factors that influence user experience and technical protocol
> concerns.
>
>
> On Jul 1, 2019, at 3:20 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards
> Architect) via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> From our LCRC review of IPP Authentication Methods, it was pointed out in
> the review that the document was lacking a "Design Requirements" subsection
> to section 3. We decided to post a draft here on the reflector, and once
> consensus was reached, to add that to the final draft to be used in the PWG
> Formal Vote of Approval.
>
>
> 3.5 Design Requirements
>
> The design requirements for this IPP Authentication Methods Best Practice
> document are:
>
> 1. Illustrate how each authentication method currently defined for IPP
> integrates into IPP interaction flows;
> 2. Identify and describe points to be considered in implementing Client or
> Printer support for authentication in general, including factors that
> influence user experience as well as protocol technical concerns.
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Smith
>
> /**
>    Smith Kennedy
>    HP Inc.
> */
>
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp@pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
> <https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/NaEyCmZ6o6hjkD2Y5HGAJTC?domain=pwg.org>
>
>
> ________________________
> Michael Sweet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp@pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>