[IPP] [PWG5100.1] Issue #88: Section 5.1.1 says 'RFC 2911 "finishings" Values'
msweet--- via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> Thu, 17 October 2019 13:49 UTC
Return-Path: <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AA61208A3 for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 06:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UUGbc7qfnkCC for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 06:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (mail.pwg.org [50.116.7.199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496DB120896 for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 06:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 363773ADB; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:49:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583AE2634; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:49:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6682D2668; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:49:36 +0000 (UTC)
To: ipp@pwg.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1000:db-issue.php
Message-Id: <issue-88@www.pwg.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:49:36 +0000
Subject: [IPP] [PWG5100.1] Issue #88: Section 5.1.1 says 'RFC 2911 "finishings" Values'
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
From: msweet--- via ipp <ipp@pwg.org>
Reply-To: webmaster@pwg.org, msweet@apple.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
[Issue Unconfirmed] The title of section 5.1.1 was never updated, but the reference points to the correct RFC (8011)... Link: http://www.pwg.org/issues/88 _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
- [IPP] [PWG5100.1] Issue #88: Section 5.1.1 says '… msweet--- via ipp