IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPP] Minutes posted from today's IPP concall

Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> Mon, 19 October 2020 23:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886213A1133 for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 16:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tAaqSt8gtGdG for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 16:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (mail.pwg.org [50.116.7.199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5959D3A1132 for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 16:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 17F43E8B5; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 23:19:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C8B2652; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 23:19:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 840DB6143; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 23:19:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.msweet.org (mail.msweet.org [173.255.209.91]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A60126DA for <ipp@pwg.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 23:19:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.16] (host-24-231-71-254.public.eastlink.ca [24.231.71.254]) by mail.msweet.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 052B980439; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 23:19:39 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
In-Reply-To: <C5802EEA-3D80-4184-92D5-39D5FBE7E95C@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 19:19:38 -0400
Message-Id: <06CA317B-78F1-472E-981B-5B862DC96EC7@msweet.org>
References: <739B0579-98EB-4323-9437-3A86298E7373@msweet.org> <C5802EEA-3D80-4184-92D5-39D5FBE7E95C@hp.com>
To: Smith Kennedy <smith.kennedy@hp.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Cc: PWG IPP Workgroup <ipp@pwg.org>
Subject: Re: [IPP] Minutes posted from today's IPP concall
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
From: Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org>
Reply-To: Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>

[image files sent separately]

Smith,

> On Oct 19, 2020, at 5:39 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <smith.kennedy@hp.com> wrote:
> ...
> Also, you said in the minutes that we might want to combine "media-overprint" and "media-overprint-type" into a collection? If you still think this is a good idea, how about:
> 
> media-overprint (collection)
> {
>    "overprint-distance" (integer): Distance past media edges that the Impression will be expanded to produce the overprint

Units are hundredths of millimeters?

>    "overprint-type" (type2 keyword): Method the Printer uses to expand the impression (could rename to "overprint-method"...)

Either works for me; values can be 'none', 'extend', and 'scale'.

> }
> 
> WDYT?

WFM.

________________________
Michael Sweet



_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp@pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email