[IPP] Questions on Specification History
wamwagner--- via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> Fri, 21 June 2019 21:53 UTC
Return-Path: <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55031200C4 for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 14:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=comcast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OTdWx6RGZvYJ for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 14:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (mail.pwg.org [50.116.7.199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F55120019 for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 14:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 4B2283F47; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 21:53:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92B02434; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 21:53:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 96C5F3C82; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 21:53:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:39]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3BCE24D5 for <ipp@pwg.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 21:53:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from resomta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.108]) by resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id eJB1hvKVg544SeRTghq9gi; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 21:53:48 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=20190202a; t=1561154028; bh=NQyYvuJOtC10KEDWv6A2oqEvLwQco1sp3RhDKhXINBQ=; h=Received:Received:MIME-Version:To:From:Subject:Date:Content-Type; b=4bpIuBls2+3PpDF4atGZs+AY+9Ggy94rjTm/wiGx3i9ESIZuWZb8m9oaI2HpUlEYZ gM7E+USvXXwFbf4YD4g8PssRem8NEPmaPdG2CF9nUq3ADlTx+eW9Ni0eLJL7zGPN+3 sf2M9mGo/nunEMgjM68ghMp26mxkk1//C3VnEWN0mCwT/RFjOJNo+/FrHu/SEfODbX NsEFW4V21S80zi3VgFhuZoecgIpE1+Hrop/B7lVqJQqpNK9copNOnJ/YNTV5gWSLc4 tl2EWb36Ph0yzXXvjDgY12K3R0yXlNrGoMc7MhqxC13KY/Y49gTnbpgZx+eiN9m/3l ZIJUPN7Eg81+A==
Received: from [IPv6:::ffff:192.168.1.6] ([73.61.211.249]) by resomta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id eRTfh5nFq0aW5eRTfhQeCJ; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 21:53:48 +0000
X-Xfinity-VAAS: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrtdejgddtvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucevohhmtggrshhtqdftvghsihdpqfgfvfdppffquffrtefokffrnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecuogfpohfkffculddutddmnecujfgurhepggfvhffuffgkrfgtsegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeeofigrmhifrghgnhgvrhestghomhgtrghsthdrnhgvtheqnecukfhppeejfedriedurddvuddurddvgeelnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopeglkffrvheimeemmehffhhffhemudelvddrudeikedruddriegnpdhinhgvthepjeefrdeiuddrvdduuddrvdegledpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeifrghmfigrghhnvghrsegtohhmtggrshhtrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepihhpphesphifghdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=10;st=legit
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: PWG IPP Workgroup <ipp@pwg.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 17:53:47 -0400
Importance: normal
X-Priority: 3
Message-Id: <20190621215351.96C5F3C82@mail.pwg.org>
Subject: [IPP] Questions on Specification History
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
From: wamwagner--- via ipp <ipp@pwg.org>
Reply-To: wamwagner@comcast.net
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5891618829351059312=="
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
Looking through the IPP Published Work list on the PWG website, I noticed that 5100.4 and 5100.10 are not listed. 5100.4 (Override Attributes for Documents and Pages) is well marked as obsolete on the FTP site. 5100.10 (Internet Printing Protocol Version 2.0) is not. 1. 5100.6 (Page Overrides) apparently obsoletes 5100.4 . It is not immediately clear whether Document Overrides are still supported. 2. The relationship between 5100.10 and 5100.12 (IPP Version 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2) does not appear to be spelled out. One would expect that .12 supersedes .10 . Is this correct? If so, should this not be indicated somewhere? Thanks Bill Wagner
_______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
- [IPP] Questions on Specification History wamwagner--- via ipp
- Re: [IPP] Questions on Specification History Ira McDonald via ipp
- Re: [IPP] Questions on Specification History Michael Sweet via ipp
- Re: [IPP] Questions on Specification History Ira McDonald via ipp