Re: [IPP] Registration of the new media sizes
Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> Tue, 22 October 2024 22:38 UTC
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) id B7420C14F70C; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B656FC14F698 for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_FAIL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pwg.org header.b="OGDQhRJ9"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pwg.org header.b="HQyx4vxl"; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=msweet.org header.b="azDfoL8r"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zfKkF2mmXumo for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (mail.pwg.org [172.104.19.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F98C14F6A1 for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id B1232E8FF; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 22:38:06 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org B1232E8FF
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pwg.org; s=default; t=1729636686; bh=jhRlZH/sOLj+ofhPAXRckJtRHASA4/5I63jgBBLxrPM=; h=In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=OGDQhRJ957VogOflRvCJtji6xxHTqUFEQ+//VORFewKhQa2zMSd5E8ZwHFplop9Yh 9ZrlrIZPG9tkgIEXupoWKKoGxmANwNJ6lUjp0hUr2/qxCGh3ODf0ok3QJawIhve7uC xCVY+OeiPdtHOuMJzFsvKzfrf7qDE87nDM1TkH9U=
Received: from mail.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5674434CE; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 22:38:05 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org 5674434CE
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pwg.org; s=default; t=1729636685; bh=jhRlZH/sOLj+ofhPAXRckJtRHASA4/5I63jgBBLxrPM=; h=In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=HQyx4vxlmgk5dV0jyazl0SKMywSh7rUunS9VOK9bMRiBqqjqyYxUvzM//rt4lgDHL FIjqQuDZJyVzpZdi0CA7eYTsSAuMVS3Aq0bdXS/+hbHnF4M2S8Lsa0k7NUrOQtIv59 UZtWKhq6QgxGFktNk+7gVe2aaS6oSpOJtEzoH1Q4=
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id E67F68823; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 22:38:03 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org E67F68823
Authentication-Results: mail.pwg.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=msweet.org header.i=@msweet.org header.b="azDfoL8r"
Received: from mail.msweet.org (mail.msweet.org [173.255.209.91]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B0492456 for <ipp@pwg.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 22:38:02 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org 0B0492456
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2605:b100:32d:7d7e:e587:edda:6d18:4163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.msweet.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8209C823D7; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 22:38:01 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.msweet.org 8209C823D7
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=msweet.org; s=default; t=1729636681; bh=iR68gxDpMwB1LIVImtdmlf6Zz5ey2IxKPfqWkNrciy8=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=azDfoL8rUCC84AYocCIxfwRpauAzofI0nEci6eDUjzNfiabKdGAwWtwHRqJB4oFdM IaKGVlcbODTXBfDhIVf22snRweipd5EDxoyftum9aH3a3tPfFqoXsV2zMMVBY262BJ pojo/VrZFAS5xps+aEKTNoFiFxjKqVZUtK1nNSR4=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.200.121\))
In-Reply-To: <CH0PR16MB44032AF9AC1BB9887F1B01D6FC4C2@CH0PR16MB4403.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 18:37:25 -0400
Message-Id: <F3702E86-574A-4634-8223-C19E499629AC@msweet.org>
References: <CH0PR16MB44032AF9AC1BB9887F1B01D6FC4C2@CH0PR16MB4403.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
To: Charles Armstrong <carmstrong@cusa.canon.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.200.121)
Subject: Re: [IPP] Registration of the new media sizes
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
From: Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org>
Reply-To: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp@pwg.org>
Cc: Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>, PWG IPP Workgroup <ipp@pwg.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
Charles, > On Oct 22, 2024, at 5:20 PM, Charles Armstrong <carmstrong@cusa.canon.com> wrote: > > Hi, Mike & all, > Canon would like to register the following new media sizes in the IANA IPP registry. > jpn_kaku6_162x229mm jpn_kaku20_229x324mm > jpn_you2_114x162mm > jpn_youchou3_120x235mm > We note that there are existing envelope media sizes (iso_c5_162x229mm, iso_c4_229x324mm, iso_c6_114x162mm, jpn_chou3_120x235mm) defined in the IANA registry with the same width and length. However, these media sizes differ in terms of envelope flap position, feed direction, or orientation. We would like to inquire about any concerns or guidelines regarding the registration of identical media sizes with he IANA IPP registry. Your feedback on this matter would be greatly appreciated. Currently MSN 2.1 does not allow for multiple named sizes to be registered with the same dimensions. We could conceptually relax this for common envelope sizes that are also sheet sizes... I will add this as a topic of discussion at Thursday's IPP workgroup conference call. ________________________ Michael Sweet _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
- [IPP] Registration of the new media sizes Charles Armstrong via ipp
- Re: [IPP] Registration of the new media sizes Michael Sweet via ipp
- Re: [IPP] Registration of the new media sizes Charles Armstrong via ipp
- Re: [IPP] Registration of the new media sizes Charles Armstrong via ipp
- Re: [IPP] Registration of the new media sizes Michael Sweet via ipp
- Re: [IPP] Registration of the new media sizes Charles Armstrong via ipp