IETF Logo Mail Archive

[IPP] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-optimistic-upgrade-00.txt

Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> Tue, 02 July 2024 13:50 UTC

Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) id E2066C1D4A9C; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14E9C180B5F for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_FAIL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pwg.org header.b="fM7tl/zu"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pwg.org header.b="NnIARhsY"; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=msweet.org header.b="qkPvfmTp"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id klevA-1B3Bcw for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (mail.pwg.org [172.104.19.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693E5C19ECBC for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 59755E8FF; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 13:50:12 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org 59755E8FF
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pwg.org; s=default; t=1719928212; bh=aykd3dx5cFCyS07STE+XAZJILL5xtPen8k5BI1TYR9E=; h=Date:References:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:From; b=fM7tl/zujgM3GEx3VwnneiJSQHitwACBVaItWro6c241aMVGSVI4U505pKG08/Soh pEOQakhfYciM/VyK4GDl1UXBuyoWG/SSfJyj5xS1PrIBebP/+l1S+gkUtjIMBkdQOs R5t9gmOhGM6bqvv060CusA6A8g1yVDTO+fL5G640=
Received: from mail.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1953A3F; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 13:50:10 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org CE1953A3F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pwg.org; s=default; t=1719928210; bh=aykd3dx5cFCyS07STE+XAZJILL5xtPen8k5BI1TYR9E=; h=Date:References:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:From; b=NnIARhsYH+eGS1tGDcDcyErv4yb4rL2+p3qq7QyV2kxTdlCOzVXrhSig5dMN1O1zp +H65VmLeQ6z7QNkIggm7kSXhPklS0sVzd/0RlKTPre1OU8Lq334Ay7x8TLO5yBtFbF 0zqW5jdQLYSm7+CMqSNbAIGNugEHCxWo6pu2/t8U=
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 68F553A46; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 13:50:09 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org 68F553A46
Authentication-Results: mail.pwg.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=msweet.org header.i=@msweet.org header.b="qkPvfmTp"
Received: from mail.msweet.org (mail.msweet.org [173.255.209.91]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D5EB3A3F for <ipp@pwg.org>; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 13:50:07 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.pwg.org 6D5EB3A3F
Received: from smtpclient.apple (cbl-66-186-76-47.vianet.ca [66.186.76.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.msweet.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10E62803AC; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 13:50:05 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.msweet.org 10E62803AC
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=msweet.org; s=default; t=1719928206; bh=I42il48dWkAR2b7glWRVUba3V1cng2U4m9/YUcN5qU0=; h=From:Date:Subject:References:To:From; b=qkPvfmTpsUkFUiOXpUBMtlK9Z/+5bGJaPjNanHwioehEJAxEphxPOir/4Py9YZm4q MXq+m+OqzFTzgxRVy9O8npJp/Gdi/dtOFVe3uBDIuT7V1CTMnI4+UcfXI9pffsGTb3 VvC3hYIi13qczbNrL50sR0BFfLezUqCzrIQMj8So=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.11\))
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 09:49:54 -0400
References: <171992598361.707343.11221187846531582497@dt-datatracker-5f88556585-g8gwj>
To: PWG IPP Workgroup <ipp@pwg.org>
Message-Id: <D239007C-C54F-48DF-A039-133FF9A97864@msweet.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.11)
Subject: [IPP] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-optimistic-upgrade-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
From: Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org>
Reply-To: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp@pwg.org>
Cc: Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0916723261132932083=="
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>

FYI, a new draft in the IETF HTTPbis WG about the Upgrade: header which we use for opportunistic encryption of IPP requests.  So far they are happy with the RFC 2817 security considerations for TLS upgrade so no changes we need to be aware of...


> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-optimistic-upgrade-00.txt
> Date: July 2, 2024 at 9:13:03 AM EDT
> To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
> Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
> Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
> Reply-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
> 
> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-httpbis-optimistic-upgrade-00.txt is now available.
> It is a work item of the HTTP (HTTPBIS) WG of the IETF.
> 
>   Title:   Security Considerations for Optimistic Use of HTTP Upgrade
>   Author:  Benjamin M. Schwartz
>   Name:    draft-ietf-httpbis-optimistic-upgrade-00.txt
>   Pages:   9
>   Dates:   2024-07-02
> 
> Abstract:
> 
>   The HTTP/1.1 Upgrade mechanism allows the client to request a change
>   to a new protocol.  This document discusses the security
>   considerations that apply to data sent by the client before this
>   request is confirmed, and updates RFC 9298 to avoid related security
>   issues.
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-optimistic-upgrade/
> 
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-optimistic-upgrade-00.html
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
> 
> 
> 

________________________
Michael Sweet


_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp@pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

v2.40.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status