IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPP] Slides to discuss feature compatibility topics for IPP EPX

Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> Thu, 04 June 2020 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD05B3A0C9B for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 11:16:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i5spo9ur4br8 for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 11:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (mail.pwg.org [50.116.7.199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609E03A0C78 for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 11:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 78581C5FE; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 18:16:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CAE126BC; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 18:16:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 3E5266268; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 18:16:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.msweet.org (mail.msweet.org [173.255.209.91]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B5726BC for <ipp@pwg.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 18:16:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from imacpro.lan (host-148-170-144-200.public.eastlink.ca [148.170.144.200]) by mail.msweet.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4326D809E1; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 18:16:24 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
In-Reply-To: <CS1PR8401MB0518A124A426AA6F9DA3907A9E890@CS1PR8401MB0518.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 14:16:23 -0400
Message-Id: <74904CEA-5473-4DE9-81B6-10E876B70F2E@msweet.org>
References: <CS1PR8401MB051848E371CD675F8CE8756C9E890@CS1PR8401MB0518.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <BY5PR10MB43214F45EE6947D3D3CF02338F890@BY5PR10MB4321.namprd10.prod.outlook.com> <CS1PR8401MB0518735AE38910BD4E3A005B9E890@CS1PR8401MB0518.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <EA97D4CD-7401-4F2C-9BD6-9750550DCCF1@msweet.org> <CS1PR8401MB0518A124A426AA6F9DA3907A9E890@CS1PR8401MB0518.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
To: "Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards)" <smith.kennedy@hp.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Cc: PWG IPP Workgroup <ipp@pwg.org>, Jeremy Leber <jeremy.leber@lexmark.com>
Subject: Re: [IPP] Slides to discuss feature compatibility topics for IPP EPX
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
From: Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp@pwg.org>
Reply-To: Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: ipp <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>

Smith,

> On Jun 4, 2020, at 2:04 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <smith.kennedy@hp.com> wrote:
> ...
> > Your question led me to wonder if there are “job accounting” attributes (Job Status attributes) that indicate that a Job is a copy of another Job to construct the audit trail?
> 
> Not at present, although I do remember having a discussion about adding a "parent-job-id" attribute at some point for this very reason. It doesn't look like it actually made it into JPS2, so that might be something to consider adding for EPX. (and then parent-job-id and parent-job-uuid for "fun")
> 
> [S.Kennedy] I’ll add “parent-job-id” and “parent-job-uuid” to EPX. Should the parent also have a Job Status attribute “copy-job-ids” and “copy-job-uuids”?

No, that will make implementation a lot more difficult.  Just have the child jobs track their immediate parent and the Client can build a tree out of it as needed...

________________________
Michael Sweet



_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp@pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email