Re: [IPP] Posted 1.1 release candidate tools

"Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) via ipp" <ipp@pwg.org> Thu, 21 May 2020 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500D23A09E1 for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 07:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=hp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mCl-GmTTIbTB for <ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 07:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (mail.pwg.org [50.116.7.199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42F23A0D05 for <ipp-archive2@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 07:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 2FA366D62; Thu, 21 May 2020 14:47:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.pwg.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119F92491; Thu, 21 May 2020 14:47:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org
Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org
Received: by mail.pwg.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 124FE3A8E; Thu, 21 May 2020 14:47:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-162.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-162.mimecast.com [63.128.21.162]) by mail.pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF4CA2491 for <ipp@pwg.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 14:47:04 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hp.com; s=mimecast20180716; t=1590072423; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fnumkjYv8yfVcHEiPhStCw5AaPFC/WlcgNZN8aveZ9A=; b=eWswxSHFDvtV12YL4IMih4bNuyjDE/sDZ4YQMubUfz2WFNZrQLXXQNAGB67JRXi0IoArL3 vlEyxGxL0/tYiDJSNziJ7aYD2I1C82i5WkaXNkeG/UmBc7AiEiG09t2GvuqmnsLypDykgR 8E526xSxS6EurQv7ouwP8Y0NsLwJEnI=
Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn7nam10lp2105.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.70.105]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-494-fnKz9XEpM9G3bAduDRpeHw-1; Thu, 21 May 2020 10:47:00 -0400
X-MC-Unique: fnKz9XEpM9G3bAduDRpeHw-1
Received: from CS1PR8401MB0632.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2a01:111:e400:7514::18) by CS1PR8401MB0727.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2a01:111:e400:750d::7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3000.20; Thu, 21 May 2020 14:46:58 +0000
Received: from CS1PR8401MB0632.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::e1db:1790:ed1b:f6f3]) by CS1PR8401MB0632.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::e1db:1790:ed1b:f6f3%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3021.020; Thu, 21 May 2020 14:46:58 +0000
To: "Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards)" <smith.kennedy@hp.com>
Thread-Topic: [IPP] Posted 1.1 release candidate tools
Thread-Index: AQHWDeOtb0IKyVdDFk6nGwZ/XzKAe6irkeKAgAJ7/QCAACNYAIAEsFuA
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 14:46:58 +0000
Message-ID: <E2FAD2DC-E3C9-45E9-A303-CC862E306FF0@hp.com>
References: <77A43605-2C50-4076-835A-0BE5AEAA2125@msweet.org> <5D41B566-E9AC-47F1-ADDD-B1EB9C83712A@hp.com> <ADEF99F9-F543-4B0A-BC1F-614977CB86EA@msweet.org> <A29F4BFE-5A1E-4CCA-B64A-C9A9DC46565F@hp.com>
In-Reply-To: <A29F4BFE-5A1E-4CCA-B64A-C9A9DC46565F@hp.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
x-originating-ip: [174.27.55.247]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 307ce687-7deb-4609-24f9-08d7fd95d08f
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CS1PR8401MB0727:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CS1PR8401MB072719D2862FAC4F7B94905C9EB70@CS1PR8401MB0727.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 041032FF37
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 1Z65WrCcUnSBsaPz3KFqyXNp698ymtcS7647XYAUFrzeK3sonVN2KdG+DWLZtVeVp2uMEgfWmjZubnpL0kZDQFd4+aVsgW8uVO/7k/VfIUwiUEb4jYpNbMl7o00P8AQZVjrLZb31nPUW4ywMi5TP4yp5G59El50V6L/w3zYOcC2isp2EKXjIZ5NfOPY0G0/PVvlA+hgCa6vZ43PEvGHF1Co5xjBmXuiuiREuBPp2ANDyeBSirKUurmJh5Sa2dU9We5C0n6Lf16rSR/X35ndWz8taV/mpRrctUIjLUH2cK5wht/01rBaQ9Y3Ri6Gg4gmBc4kYmOzZdHYThihkj+bjlD0XGwqC5Ly+I2gHsuFckrImQ7HpmYKfsMo3X6xhIbXqr4rKhDm8kTxH0QprMO+Mrubp0jGTKtEMarv8VAh3s8/RwmJN4lX56TvtdiighmqT
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:CS1PR8401MB0632.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(39860400002)(346002)(376002)(396003)(136003)(366004)(5660300002)(53546011)(37006003)(316002)(6200100001)(6506007)(478600001)(8676002)(6512007)(4326008)(6862004)(36756003)(54906003)(8936002)(66446008)(186003)(76116006)(64756008)(91956017)(6486002)(26005)(86362001)(99936003)(2906002)(33656002)(2616005)(71200400001)(66946007)(66476007)(66556008)(66616009); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: +ehANQf7RZA3XwVBZfljfyL2I/YMfI7KcHeHBhWkvM2S1A5ts50dtHgx2ypgN9dE0AbMYW+AE9Ufk5CXI/T7FYcLsvXu9JYtR7pe/ZvRGd5zHWLYNKccaUCT+yYIwaS8Dp4STq4G6ZSf+ghYNRumoBwhUCZV759pQw7d2EJ2oHsSdBeUGgtYaixVJ9sgK69nSrfpDkhCs67VkecMRsLkDoaZT8rkG3o5MIWb3odtoyG24aWfXVdIVY/jQyxEhFdxXtlgusWXSg8OvlZmHE9JeZkQnqOqH0lKepHZxd00VzNmkzEOEDUd/Rp5jSSMGS/c4Tv/7qunO4CYV1ix05RNpYRjpQKBmstku4nCFlKc/x/yg57S1iIpf6R7nlQf1VEUUoe7ueTieNPY/i0mX+Q8jMnROEbJVnX6kbUhAx0n8f/jzlwpWiIPDjpNsOEdDKMHxgWsoPR5JJ2MMyg0MLtnKFcrolujDMSekVPyrzZ1RvQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hp.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 307ce687-7deb-4609-24f9-08d7fd95d08f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 May 2020 14:46:58.5741 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: ca7981a2-785a-463d-b82a-3db87dfc3ce6
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: frZQQw1VEUMOG4HzTuaqVrdLvbxlGXnCTeN3zUVi3aqJnSQP2PD50GKHIIc4U1LlXPZD6swYN4sdALWoJcMpWQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CS1PR8401MB0727
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: hp.com
Cc: PWG IPP WG Reflector <ipp@pwg.org>, PWG IPP Everywhere Self-Certification Reflector <ippeveselfcert@pwg.org>
Subject: Re: [IPP] Posted 1.1 release candidate tools
X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp.pwg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/options/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipp@pwg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>, <mailto:ipp-request@pwg.org?subject=subscribe>
From: "Kennedy, Smith \(Wireless & IPP Standards\) via ipp" <ipp@pwg.org>
Reply-To: "Kennedy, Smith \(Wireless & IPP Standards\)" <smith.kennedy@hp.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3862941880658417462=="
Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org
Sender: "ipp" <ipp-bounces@pwg.org>


> On May 18, 2020, at 9:10 AM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) via ipp <ipp@pwg.org> wrote:
> 
>> On May 18, 2020, at 7:04 AM, Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org <mailto:msweet@msweet.org>> wrote:
>> 
> 
>> > 3. The current I-10.5 and I-10.6 are failing on my IPP Everywhere 1.0 certified printer. I'm wondering whether these tests ought to be enabled only if some DEFINE is defined ("PEDANTIC" / "WARNINGS" etc.). I know they should pass, but if that hasn't been exercised previously, that can cause some additional thrash. I don't want to lower the bar and remove those tests, but if there was some grace period, that might help teams who are trying to certify in the near term. I'm not sure what others think. Asking my firmware teams whether fixing that in pending devices' certifications will cause thrash.
>> 
>> These tests (for requested-attributes='printer-description' and ='job-template') were added because the non-conformance to STD92 was causing problems with getting full IPP Everywhere support working in CUPS.
>> 
>> I'd like to know what the failures were - too many attributes returned, too few? Too many isn't a serious interoperability issue - might lead to some laziness on the Client side but testing will catch that - but too few prevents Clients from working which *is* a serious interoperability issue...
> 
> I'll look into this - more soon.

OK, so the "job-template" returns basically nothing other than "attributes-charset" and "attributes-natural-language", which seems too few. 😞 It seems the firmware is equating 'job-template' with 'none' and 'printer-description' with 'all'.
_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp@pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp