[Ippm-ioam-ix-dt] IPv6 IOAM

Justin Iurman <justin.iurman@uliege.be> Thu, 26 November 2020 16:51 UTC

Return-Path: <justin.iurman@uliege.be>
X-Original-To: ippm-ioam-ix-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm-ioam-ix-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7CB93A14C9 for <ippm-ioam-ix-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:51:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=uliege.be
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3XnNoHFeuHqG for <ippm-ioam-ix-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:51:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be (serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be [139.165.32.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E99E13A14D0 for <ippm-ioam-ix-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:51:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be (serv470.segi.ulg.ac.be [139.165.32.199]) by serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DA9200F48B for <ippm-ioam-ix-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:51:26 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be 58DA9200F48B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uliege.be; s=ulg20190529; t=1606409486; bh=bGa7M1+aPLHtx+GJrUSeZKFdyaVd20KQbq/l0+WAeZk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:From; b=2EnrjNut0qESM/n21siG0viimGUezBo9lCfRg16OVPsrUjkp50cv5LXSE6kEKW4lY 14UHJD0uZTk415vo7dTVXoW9SCCdXxzPUc+9YgDYEmLJMcEHnxJoEWw5tMMdJmTPw9 WpzLkIqlvVqlwNQweWDiuavThK25Tsj3nsciQZF6xsyCoXyNNPFTnT13w9u4EmfbOG z6eQdxdBiF3QWN+NKawrx8KCGz4s3r8P0XSwNT534nCGbml2ZoRSJyMXSWsqja3fxn kSXTWkDfeAR8Jen4vfGi5bQJEg56FDlsrqhacYbatXErt5mW2WXd6/BGRjnplVb94N 35uUzUPIpWZmQ==
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA9D129E937 for <ippm-ioam-ix-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:51:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id xd6SNJHCzPCt for <ippm-ioam-ix-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:51:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be (mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be [139.165.32.199]) by mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3647C129E923 for <ippm-ioam-ix-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:51:26 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:51:26 +0100
From: Justin Iurman <justin.iurman@uliege.be>
Reply-To: Justin Iurman <justin.iurman@uliege.be>
To: ippm-ioam-ix-dt@ietf.org
Message-ID: <1682913505.123716622.1606409486137.JavaMail.zimbra@uliege.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [87.64.56.46]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_3955 (ZimbraWebClient - FF83 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_3953)
Thread-Index: +S42UGjP5gpqIdPpEO70BWt6U37Prg==
Thread-Topic: IPv6 IOAM
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm-ioam-ix-dt/AqUjG1btlm0UKem0GRm2LPbGjiU>
Subject: [Ippm-ioam-ix-dt] IPv6 IOAM
X-BeenThere: ippm-ioam-ix-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPPM iOAM Immediate Export \(IX\) design team" <ippm-ioam-ix-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm-ioam-ix-dt>, <mailto:ippm-ioam-ix-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm-ioam-ix-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm-ioam-ix-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-ioam-ix-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm-ioam-ix-dt>, <mailto:ippm-ioam-ix-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:51:33 -0000

Hey everyone,

Following our discussion about the IPv6 tunnel issues for in-transit traffic, here is the draft I mentioned [1] during last meeting that could potentially be a solution to avoid the IPv6-in-IPv6 encapsulation and allow for direct/inline insertion (same as for the host2host use case). And, Barak, this solution would also make the incremental option compliant with RFC8200, which is good news.

Thoughts?

Justin

  [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-herbert-6man-eh-attrib