IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] FW: New Version Notification for draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt

Aijun Wang <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn> Wed, 26 January 2022 09:20 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE8C3A2CC5 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 01:20:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ADoQmqaCXPX for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 01:20:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.227]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8334B3A2CC9 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 01:20:46 -0800 (PST)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.188:51478.1125904617
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-219.142.69.75 (unknown [172.18.0.188]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 0C9E82800EF; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 17:20:41 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 66040164@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.188]) by app0023 with ESMTP id 93ce7e12cc4a417db9364eeae5ee1d87 for ippm@ietf.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 17:20:43 CST
X-Transaction-ID: 93ce7e12cc4a417db9364eeae5ee1d87
X-Real-From: wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.188
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Sender: wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn
From: Aijun Wang <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn>
To: 'Tianran Zhou' <zhoutianran=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, 'IETF IPPM WG' <ippm@ietf.org>
References: <164300504281.12619.16642699818590435984@ietfa.amsl.com> <f3bb01f8591e43e885d8a110f2d96e66@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <f3bb01f8591e43e885d8a110f2d96e66@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 17:20:40 +0800
Message-ID: <015a01d81295$fdd37370$f97a5a50$@chinatelecom.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQFSW9tjDYRgLyz9iGSKYYx+rezmPQGWFUuIrXPBCCA=
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/-0wbF6DyIc_SPTgfJ4bAYA5e-v8>
Subject: Re: [ippm] FW: New Version Notification for draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:20:51 -0000

Hi, Tianran:

Have a brief review of this draft. I think its aim is straightforward and
will be useful to utilize the member link within the LAG.
Some comments are below:
1) It seems there is no Sender/Reflector behavior description for the Mirco
OWAMP session and the packet format? 
2) For the newly defined Session-Sender Packet/Session-Reflector Packet, how
to assure the backward compatibility? What I have seen is that you add two
additional fields within the existing Packet? 


Best Regards

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

-----Original Message-----
From: ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 2:23 PM
To: IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org) <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: [ippm] FW: New Version Notification for
draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt

Hi WG,

We think this is an useful work on adapting OWAMP/TWAMP in LAG performance
measurement.
We updated this draft based on the comments from the meeting discussion and
mailing list.
Thanks for all the suggestions.
More reviews and comments are welcome.

Cheers,
Tianran

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 2:17 PM
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>; Guo Jun <guo.jun2@zte.com.cn>; Jun
Guo <guo.jun2@zte.com.cn>; Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi@cisco.com>; Tianran Zhou
<zhoutianran@huawei.com>; Zhenqiang Li <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt
has been successfully submitted by Tianran Zhou and posted to the IETF
repository.

Name:           draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag
Revision:       02
Title:          One-way/Two-way Active Measurement Protocol Extensions for
Performance Measurement on LAG
Document date:  2022-01-24
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          13
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02

Abstract:
   This document defines extensions to One-way Active Measurement
   Protocol (OWAMP), and Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) to
   implement performance measurement on every member link of a Link
   Aggregation Group (LAG).  Knowing the measured metrics of each member
   link of a LAG enables operators to enforce the performance based
   traffic steering policy across the member links.





The IETF Secretariat


_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status