Re: [ippm] FW: New Version Notification for draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt

xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Thu, 10 February 2022 08:13 UTC

Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B4D3A1561 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:13:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dvwY7AikSwIU for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:13:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD7DF3A0598 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:13:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.251.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4JvTyQ1Wg6z8MwF4 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:13:02 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.238]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxct.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4JvTxq0zsXz501Zm; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:12:31 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp05.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.204]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 21A8CKkS076987; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:12:20 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp01[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:12:20 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:12:20 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2af96204c8e4659a227e
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202202101612201991161@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <202202101541562359727@zte.com.cn>
References: 202202101541562359727@zte.com.cn
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: guo.jun2@zte.com.cn
Cc: zhoutianran=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 21A8CKkS076987
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-FangMail-Miltered: at cgslv5.04-192.168.250.137.novalocal with ID 6204C90E.000 by FangMail milter!
X-FangMail-Envelope: 1644480782/4JvTyQ1Wg6z8MwF4/6204C90E.000/192.168.251.13/[192.168.251.13]/mxct.zte.com.cn/<xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 6204C90E.000/4JvTyQ1Wg6z8MwF4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/-8UfrDSLGQOGKb4eXj5J5NQHb60>
Subject: Re: [ippm] FW: New Version Notification for draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:13:10 -0000

I agree with Guo Jun and support its progressing.

Cheers,
Xiao Min
------------------原始邮件------------------
发件人:郭俊10086979
收件人:zhoutianran=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org;
抄送人:ippm@ietf.org;
日 期 :2022年02月10日 15:43
主 题 :Re: [ippm]  FW: New Version Notification for draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt
_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

Hi Tianran,
I have review the new version, LAG performance measurement is a important feature,I think this work is very meaningful. I support it and hope it can evolve forward.
In addition, I have a question below:

"To support the micro TWAMP session, a new command, Request-TW-Micro-
Session (TBD2), is defined in this document.  The Request-TW-Micro-
Session command is based on the TWAMP Request-Session command, and
uses the message format as described in Section 3.5 of TWAMP [RFC5357]. "
My question is: member links have the same source IP 、destination IP 、source port number, and destination port number, if use the message format as described in Section 3.5 of TWAMP[RFC5357]. How to distinguish member link session of LAG?




郭俊
软件平台南京开发三部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部
中兴通讯股份有限公司
南京市雨花台区紫荆花路68号南研一期2楼,210012
T: xxxxxxx     M: 18105183663
E: guo.jun2@zte.com.cn
发件人:TianranZhou
收件人:IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)
日 期 :2022年01月24日 14:23
主 题 :[ippm] FW: New Version Notification for draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt
Hi WG,
We think this is an useful work on adapting OWAMP/TWAMP in LAG performance measurement.
We updated this draft based on the comments from the meeting discussion and mailing list.
Thanks for all the suggestions.
More reviews and comments are welcome.
Cheers,
Tianran
-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 2:17 PM
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>; Guo Jun <guo.jun2@zte.com.cn>; Jun Guo <guo.jun2@zte.com.cn>; Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi@cisco.com>; Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>; Zhenqiang Li <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt
has been successfully submitted by Tianran Zhou and posted to the IETF repository.
Name:        draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag
Revision:    02
Title:        One-way/Two-way Active Measurement Protocol Extensions for Performance Measurement on LAG
Document date:    2022-01-24
Group:        Individual Submission
Pages:        13
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag-02
Abstract:
This document defines extensions to One-way Active Measurement
Protocol (OWAMP), and Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) to
implement performance measurement on every member link of a Link
Aggregation Group (LAG).  Knowing the measured metrics of each member
link of a LAG enables operators to enforce the performance based
traffic steering policy across the member links.
The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm