IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG

Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com> Fri, 02 September 2022 08:24 UTC

Return-Path: <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F385C14CE33 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 01:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y9nu3TI-xwxJ for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 01:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EFA6C14CE21 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 01:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml712-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MJrXB1frFz67cQc; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 16:23:22 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) by fraeml712-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 10:24:06 +0200
Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.031; Fri, 2 Sep 2022 10:24:06 +0200
From: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
To: Marcus Ihlar <marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Call for adoption of PM on LAG
Thread-Index: Adi+IfLIHDT5LddtQ/WfPt2JAJ+z9AAg0sBw
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 08:24:06 +0000
Message-ID: <66855b3b2a4e4b4f9b8962c4274f992a@huawei.com>
References: <AM0PR07MB4131BFFD304468FA4CCD0484E27B9@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB4131BFFD304468FA4CCD0484E27B9@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.81.220.99]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_66855b3b2a4e4b4f9b8962c4274f992ahuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/-DpApTfLLzs5LqLXr3hpy7hGUF0>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 08:24:12 -0000

Hi All,
I have read both drafts and support their adoption.

Regards,

Giuseppe

From: ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Marcus Ihlar
Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2022 6:44 PM
To: IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org) <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG

Hello IPPM,
This email starts an adoption call in the IPPM working group for the draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag and draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag documents. These documents extend STAMP, OWAMP and TWAMP to support performance measurements on member links of a Link Aggregation Group.

The first draft specifies an extension to STAMP and can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag/

The second draft specifies extensions to OWAMP and TWAMP and can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/

Please reply to this email by Thursday September 15, to indicate whether you support adoption of these documents.

BR
Marcus & Tommy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email