[ippm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-2680-bis-03.txt> (A One-Way Loss Metric for IPPM) to Internet Standard

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Tue, 28 July 2015 14:11 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C68B1A9218; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 07:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mvzxRIjKM4wK; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 07:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E0D1A8894; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 07:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.2.0.p1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Sender: iesg-secretary@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150728141012.23624.27752.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 07:10:12 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/-IDILOVsFMNE4a0tmn8VN1P8qwQ>
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
Subject: [ippm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-2680-bis-03.txt> (A One-Way Loss Metric for IPPM) to Internet Standard
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:11:36 -0000

The IESG has received a request from the IP Performance Metrics WG (ippm)
to consider the following document:
- 'A One-Way Loss Metric for IPPM'
  <draft-ietf-ippm-2680-bis-03.txt> as Internet Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-08-11. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   This memo (RFC 2680 bis) defines a metric for one-way loss of packets
   across Internet paths.  It builds on notions introduced and discussed
   in the IPPM Framework document, RFC 2330; the reader is assumed to be
   familiar with that document.  This memo makes RFC 2680 obsolete.

Note:
   This memo replaces an old Proposed Standard, and should be evaluated
    for suitability as an Internet Standards.

   There are two Normative references to Informational RFCs:

  ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 2330

  ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 7312

The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-2680-bis/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-2680-bis/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.