Re: [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8912 (6755)

Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Mon, 24 January 2022 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484CD3A15D4 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 15:06:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uOgZG6K8vpnV for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 15:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFC0D3A15D9 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 15:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70FE424B435; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 15:06:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q5pq63pscmWg; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 15:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.16] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74DA7424B434; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 15:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211127211835.526DAF5D08@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 15:06:43 -0800
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, nmalykh@ieee.org, "MORTON JR., AL" <acmorton@att.com>, ippm@ietf.org, kld@att.com, philip.eardley@bt.com, marcelo@it.uc3m.es
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5EA0BA63-4E14-4B39-8BAB-873DB59A5F65@amsl.com>
References: <20211127211835.526DAF5D08@rfc-editor.org>
To: martin.h.duke@gmail.com, Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/-XYewo21BEODYoA471mnO-sS6L4>
Subject: Re: [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8912 (6755)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 23:06:50 -0000

Greetings,

We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial.  
Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata 
report to “Technical”.  As Stream Approver, please review and set the 
Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/)

You may review the report at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6755

Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further 
information on how to verify errata reports.

Further information on errata can be found at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs

> On Nov 27, 2021, at 1:18 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8912,
> "Initial Performance Metrics Registry Entries".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6755
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@ieee.org>
> 
> Section: 5.3.5
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> 5.3.5.  Runtime Parameters and Data Format
> 
>   Src:  The IP address of the host in the Src Role (format
>      ipv4-address-no-zone value for IPv4 or ipv6-address-no-zone value
>      for IPv6; see Section 4 of [RFC6991]).
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> 5.3.5.  Runtime Parameters and Data Format
> 
>   Runtime Parameters are input factors that must be determined,
>   configured into the measurement system, and reported with the results
>   for the context to be complete.
> 
>   Src:  The IP address of the host in the Src Role (format
>      ipv4-address-no-zone value for IPv4 or ipv6-address-no-zone value
>      for IPv6; see Section 4 of [RFC6991]).
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Skipped paragraph.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8912 (draft-ietf-ippm-initial-registry-16)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Initial Performance Metrics Registry Entries
> Publication Date    : November 2021
> Author(s)           : A. Morton, M. Bagnulo, P. Eardley, K. D'Souza
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : IP Performance Measurement
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>