[ippm] Mail regarding draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization
Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@gmail.com> Wed, 20 November 2024 20:45 UTC
Return-Path: <cpignata@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96A6C1D4A94; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 12:45:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KenynEGeAwIk; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 12:45:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw1-x112e.google.com (mail-yw1-x112e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::112e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16DBCC1519B3; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 12:45:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw1-x112e.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6eebb54fc48so953337b3.1; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 12:45:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1732135534; x=1732740334; darn=ietf.org; h=to:cc:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Liij9jnsAd6H7RFSXKjpbAF3pgbpTI5MYSXeIh27KlY=; b=F3Yw7HYQwq+nrtnHffq0TPRUwoZ18cLpTcymj9Tm3Qhqd96WyHVZ74X5DJuCnk9Vp+ c2ggBqKSIlb8BkSJ5Hr8sTRo6bTgDjaFHevV6+0Yrub+shRwlc6qImQOE10GBi1aThaz Fck6Q0WWTZEPYa3ErBjbb19oKhp/Gu5iInFLXteMQ2M1Pi/zSeQigPZE/sP+Q+t1/zv1 z0hpN1jQxI+ujcjYkrwiEQZXiTJX1xzKvBeQhi4+8e581PB0e8uOaDrr1JCOtR6MK63F NQcgUhq9XKVrNtMbFSMwApoX9c9TY+0ZrrQ3mKS7KwnK9bLEPHqlKNSRNfH8eMPKW3oN N2ww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1732135534; x=1732740334; h=to:cc:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Liij9jnsAd6H7RFSXKjpbAF3pgbpTI5MYSXeIh27KlY=; b=dQdxkNg3aBUuwKNFsfVlfIdHb2l79D2nGvlk1kMmAg74Wu9kefhZifwBQNt6PHGMIr kgCx5eM0EOLxXa73IbMNVrZvytwaI0mlAaoI05LCqApQRBgD0pFpSOaeATAaj8KBfDOB eJMW7Z4kJMwqgwTHwpx/faUBvHQ6lWibSaMG0N4rMzbxxh44ar4E7eFdv1/wkFPL+iMh Db4LCV0UD0s9BsUz4/yWsgxSyyNg2On37qoc2hXXJXPiTo9834KX/qCewKw7KUc1D9Mw //Tlug4IjwGGvlIPfSZLGT9CGVd8oIDRSdvLN2jzm1hbxrBNB7aSUmIqP06bNKm/5qvp cTSQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVqRrtf4eL2ougGaXDcEJjFm+vrxh20/yO7698koTxUrhqZjbHt3gSNqALNY1Qh9apoEWKrOomCf6Me3yVYVHiWS8UYAT3RNr/GQJtkjHcQ3AR5Q0F3ef6qPmtNPLM=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyOnHsIm1BrPMxbagVqA6Kejh4Qe5espQVrQFYG2/XMhdPXUZ3k yieZs0Dsi/h4pr/nYkRW1WdZvYh7D9FdDQlRrB3g7IaFOM0RWvWtxsC50w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGcY2nsdWg/6zO9bJiBONEtjPqpfE21PGiSNLizD5Z5PiPy42Ij2oGxm3F/UbxOGZTJjcawTQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:4982:b0:6e7:e1aa:ba80 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6eebd163539mr43909967b3.18.1732135534424; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 12:45:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:1700:850:30a0:e870:e74f:72cc:a74c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 00721157ae682-6eecc1514d3sm1582307b3.43.2024.11.20.12.45.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Nov 2024 12:45:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_742B24CE-D69C-44E4-8F26-686BB6DB795D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.200.121\))
Message-Id: <C145C4B6-CDA5-4D6E-8BFD-51F1D735C479@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 15:45:23 -0500
To: IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.200.121)
Message-ID-Hash: GPIDEQMAHZVEL6Q6NR67IXTU5FQPTLIJ
X-Message-ID-Hash: GPIDEQMAHZVEL6Q6NR67IXTU5FQPTLIJ
X-MailFrom: cpignata@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ippm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization.chairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [ippm] Mail regarding draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/02kw1LDnNq05yEIXx3wqzE-olRc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ippm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ippm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ippm-leave@ietf.org>
Dear IPPM WG, Following up on an earlier post [1], please see a new revision on the draft on Guidelines for Characterizing "OAM", and invite all feedback and comments on the Ops AWG mailing list. Thanks! Carlos. [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/KQseRmMujO4aa3YEG0fhsPm2Xy4/ —>8— It is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG of the IETF. Title: Guidelines for Characterizing "OAM" Authors: Carlos Pignataro Adrian Farrel Name: draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization-04.txt Pages: 11 Dates: 2024-11-11 Abstract: As the IETF continues to produce and standardize different Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) protocols and technologies, various qualifiers and modifiers are prepended to the OAM abbreviation. While, at first glance, the most used appear to be well understood, the same qualifier may be interpreted differently in different contexts. A case in point is the qualifiers "in-band" and "out-of-band" which have their origins in the radio lexicon, and which have been extrapolated into other communication networks. This document considers some common qualifiers and modifiers that are prepended, within the context of packet networks, to the OAM abbreviation and lays out guidelines for their use in future IETF work. This document updates RFC 6291 by adding to the guidelines for the use of the term "OAM". It does not modify any other part of RFC 6291. The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization/ There is also an HTMLized version available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization-04 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization-04 —>8—
- [ippm] Mail regarding draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-chara… Carlos Pignataro