Re: [ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7497 (7505)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of t petch
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 11:27 AM
> To: ippm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7497 (7505)
> 
> On 28/04/2023 14:50, MORTON JR., AL wrote:
> > I don't understand the correction requested by this Errata.
> 
> It is called spam.  Sign up to a fwe more WG lists and you can see that
> the sender has submitted corresponding e-mail to every one, or at least
> every one that I am subscribed to.
> 
> Tom Petch
[acm] 
Thanks, I didn't see a corresponding spam errata on other lists, and didn't want to offend the author if this was some sort of technical problem with Errata submissions by calling it "spam".
Al

> 
> >
> > The Section number is non-existent, and the Original Text is the same as the
> Corrected Text.
> >
> > I can't recommend any action.
> > Al
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
> >> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 9:45 AM
> >> To: MORTON JR., AL <acmorton@att.com>; martin.h.duke@gmail.com;
> >> Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com; marcus.ihlar@ericsson.com;
> tpauly@apple.com
> >> Cc: rajeevsurroach11@gmail.com; ippm@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> >> Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7497 (7505)
> >>
> >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7497,
> >> "Rate Measurement Test Protocol Problem Statement and Requirements".
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> You may review the report below and at:
> >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-
> >>
> editor.org/errata/eid7505__;!!BhdT!iXn4_VX8mPysjw4pLPTtnri0enWbjRXZOv28jGDeXw3
> >> E98AiaFzywJBqjalo4v9hKjdsaFqsopm2PFRXyDXy$
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> Type: Technical
> >> Reported by: Rajeev Kumar Surroach <rajeevsurroach11@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Section: 7485
> >>
> >> Original Text
> >> -------------
> >> 7497
> >>
> >> Corrected Text
> >> --------------
> >> 7497
> >>
> >> Notes
> >> -----
> >> Solve the issue
> >>
> >> Instructions:
> >> -------------
> >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> RFC7497 (draft-ietf-ippm-rate-problem-10)
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> Title               : Rate Measurement Test Protocol Problem Statement and
> >> Requirements
> >> Publication Date    : April 2015
> >> Author(s)           : A. Morton
> >> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> >> Source              : IP Performance Measurement
> >> Area                : Transport
> >> Stream              : IETF
> >> Verifying Party     : IESG
> > _______________________________________________
> > ippm mailing list
> > ippm@ietf.org
> >
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm__;!!Bhd
> T!lEC39ApVGDvCq_UbMqyVE_JBIk_Ivvsk37_-
> IsW73wreSLc7_hxB_Y0ZoIPx03PDfJzfFOv67ngN$
> > .
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm__;!!Bhd
> T!lEC39ApVGDvCq_UbMqyVE_JBIk_Ivvsk37_-
> IsW73wreSLc7_hxB_Y0ZoIPx03PDfJzfFOv67ngN$