IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Fri, 09 September 2022 01:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF209C1522A9 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 18:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oAUSe1lezLvz for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 18:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDB62C1526E4 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 18:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MNywy1zTwz67L3x for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 09:25:38 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemi100016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.123) by fraeml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2375.31; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 03:26:23 +0200
Received: from kwepemi500017.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.110) by kwepemi100016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 09:26:21 +0800
Received: from kwepemi500017.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.110]) by kwepemi500017.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.110]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Fri, 9 Sep 2022 09:26:21 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: Marcus Ihlar <marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Call for adoption of PM on LAG
Thread-Index: Adi+IfLIHDT5LddtQ/WfPt2JAJ+z9AFyH/GA
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 01:26:21 +0000
Message-ID: <1b4f5eb2dbe54e5eae60e54f10faabab@huawei.com>
References: <AM0PR07MB4131BFFD304468FA4CCD0484E27B9@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB4131BFFD304468FA4CCD0484E27B9@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.40.66]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1b4f5eb2dbe54e5eae60e54f10faababhuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/0hyCHZCmBhEdLTaOAfI7_KEcKLo>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 01:26:31 -0000

Hi,

I’ve read the latest version of these documents, they provide useful OAM features for the LAGs, and the documents are in a good shape. Thus I support the adoption of both documents.

Best regards,
Jie

From: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marcus Ihlar
Sent: Friday, September 2, 2022 12:44 AM
To: IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org) <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG

Hello IPPM,
This email starts an adoption call in the IPPM working group for the draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag and draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag documents. These documents extend STAMP, OWAMP and TWAMP to support performance measurements on member links of a Link Aggregation Group.

The first draft specifies an extension to STAMP and can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag/

The second draft specifies extensions to OWAMP and TWAMP and can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag/

Please reply to this email by Thursday September 15, to indicate whether you support adoption of these documents.

BR
Marcus & Tommy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email