IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options

Justin Iurman <justin.iurman@uliege.be> Mon, 21 March 2022 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <justin.iurman@uliege.be>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FCBF3A1AC7; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 12:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=uliege.be
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1-mHzx9yE1u0; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 12:10:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be (serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be [139.165.32.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D30733A07D6; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 12:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.157.203] (dhcp-9dcb.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.157.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 168F8200CCE0; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 20:10:13 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be 168F8200CCE0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uliege.be; s=ulg20190529; t=1647889813; bh=eIcmQzFBIA5731m/I/34qfZJyrDsNFHZR+UgDb/PdcU=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:Cc:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=pQ3HxUNQBtan8vTWQkPTTZscsmx1ZNHB4SESiOAJ8hzc1D0PFHpjbb2UPuIDqHo/R FkngqgyeSu4CN104rDZpwUAzw4S7iJl5wY118D15WO88mQLmPdPrbHgY01LQs1kGP9 ED36JACidpjXM/EIhHimnu586WcXBxElNlHrrtwvhbah30n9J6vC5NJRE4aUulre/k 4ImQps2BM4NUQ5ELcNh7N4sMg1gztd5EOVwjdAVyV8VOOOtGr2mhuehK/+FJMcjZoR AxMmcPVkrVJI/3vei0akaIWJ3BpDQcT4E+sQMRs7D8pCPn5YedEudWu42dtJ5I/sKH BuMIbIZTbjv+Q==
Message-ID: <9f001bd4-309f-5516-0af5-07409893cf57@uliege.be>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 20:10:12 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: ippm@ietf.org
References: <AM0PR07MB41315DF88FF077CC72F474A6E2789@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <VI1PR07MB4142D5C930CF1A38FBBB28FAE2349@VI1PR07MB4142.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: ippm-chairs@ietf.org, martin.h.duke@gmail.com, fbrockne@cisco.com
From: Justin Iurman <justin.iurman@uliege.be>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR07MB4142D5C930CF1A38FBBB28FAE2349@VI1PR07MB4142.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/24JIh54VM1owRmP7TzM8bfeaF-0>
Subject: Re: [ippm] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 19:10:23 -0000

Martin,

As discussed quickly right after today's meeting, could you maybe take 
care of asking one more time for extension of both IPv6 IOAM code points 
[1] (IPv6 parameters, Destination Options and Hop-by-Hop Options 
registry)? Although the document went through WGLC recently (see below), 
both code points are set to expire soon (2022-04-16).

Tommy, Marcus, thoughts on this? I think it would make sense to extend 
them. We should be fine by then.

Thanks,
Justin

   [1] 
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-parameters/ipv6-parameters.xhtml#ipv6-parameters-2

On 2/15/22 17:45, Marcus Ihlar wrote:
> Hi IPPM,
> 
> This WGLC is concluded and we see clear support for progressing the 
> document.
> 
> Thanks to everyone who has contributed with feedback and to the authors 
> for addressing the feedback in a revision.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Marcus Ihlar
> 
> *From:* Marcus Ihlar
> *Sent:* den 17 december 2021 16:39
> *To:* ippm@ietf.org
> *Subject:* WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options
> 
> Hello IPPM,
> 
> This email starts a Working Group Last Call on 
> draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options/ 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options/>
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options-06 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options-06>
> 
> Please provide feedback by replying to this email with your reviews and 
> if you think this document is ready to progress, by *Friday, January 14*.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Marcus & Tommy
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email