IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv

David Sinicrope <david.sinicrope@gmail.com> Wed, 10 July 2019 10:48 UTC

Return-Path: <david.sinicrope@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02EB1201CA; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1i9uVb8rEMGy; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31F31120119; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id k8so1712183eds.7; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=VYs94ZCc5CrY7DlErEQ6KIwdVpyPC9wAAvlB7tW8F9Y=; b=CP2ZHse1JZMtEM+CAWKsUbNsCTK7PHsO2yygWfXQYG1EhfaURozEE7gfIeT/Q+q5lp CeG+eygIHJ4Qd+LUyJ1qcOePPkXfJB3CRWw75PkN3lCYlLIL68m6JMQc4mI0XTVd5SLv ijx54NY88OtDM3CAXzS6soPvmaM7ktRKO40Bfc/a/l6UcPbke78CeTZZYMQ2cuqiYHN/ lP+zrIvUsE/p1dvg8ozyn3BNwl74AaO3GmO7KLkI8SA6QUS35dgIgvY+8PAEFt/xksGF oEly90lY3/U9mDsRPE9dFGXzTfadztakx1GeJ0UaS1RfgxI905/mV3GLIzEwQBSwCvvd 2kQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=VYs94ZCc5CrY7DlErEQ6KIwdVpyPC9wAAvlB7tW8F9Y=; b=WZB/eLf4fRm/zyc04KFyYfbkxtZtVAkX8U4qzmNiTbIgG98k6VgE7uhX3aYrvrkKby lnogHW3Iyqal6xLzGXgPNk0uFkhCA0Z+z7TX0mGg7myG2khJNI+GAxrv7jgvprA3mjrL yplfM/8J10vYp/YUps1fKRDPO922XcZBpFi7pgNHvwXaOwFZPV03k7nKknfxXtd999P7 cSUPIUH/c++YW4eLcM884jJFxoybxy0sVr+rC4ipcsonrOGN56xdu9bDimHcQo6lqZ4s LlXXo8LJrBaAhII/0z/+MKKKe2cDLk/sFCUr3LPosd8eZrzCnwCqjs6c8DauPEk3xStQ SCLg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVne86E/ieWIJ5U/d849sQtqjNg46ZbBjD8Wimb6n+1RbPRWIM3 crBUeC6C6PXV9vPnn3Vfox/AmuVPr/E=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw1kAUcwQ5wt/9ulvHoIlTIV82NA34oh1Xk04KJzH7eTVw/obOfTGZsO6d94lkG6VVW/EUw9w==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4d89:: with SMTP id s9mr25621499eju.160.1562755724724; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [156.106.225.230] ([156.106.225.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h10sm605432ede.93.2019.07.10.03.48.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3D980694-97FB-4407-97BE-58A5E10D3C2F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: David Sinicrope <david.sinicrope@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <C3852A60-4580-47E9-A998-C0026D36523B@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:48:42 +0200
Cc: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>, draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv@ietf.org
Message-Id: <223C64BE-5B73-4876-BAD7-DDEF06285240@gmail.com>
References: <C3852A60-4580-47E9-A998-C0026D36523B@apple.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/3B09ujJsB1hP_p0PaeYpKUrAYlM>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:48:49 -0000

The Broadband Forum has related work on WT-390i2 - Performance Measurement between Customer Equipment and IP Edge using STAMP that intends to make normative reference to this document once it completes the IETF process.

Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks!
Dave Sinicrope
IETF Liaison Manager to Broadband Forum

> On Jul 9, 2019, at 12:47 AM, Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello IPPM,
> 
> This message begins an adoption call for draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv, "Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol Optional Extensions”. The document has been discussed on the list recently, with good input and reviews from the group. We’d like to get the working group’s input on if this document should be adopted and worked on by the group.
> 
> The current status and text of the document can be found here:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv/>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-05 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-05>
> 
> Please respond to this email by Tuesday, July 23 to indicate whether or not you think IPPM should adopt and work on the extensions and extension mechanism described in this draft.
> 
> Best,
> Tommy (as IPPM co-chair)
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email