[ippm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-metrics-08.txt> (Reporting Metrics: Different Points of View) to Informational RFC

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Wed, 28 March 2012 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420C321F893A; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.563
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.036, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 97YVUWj8c0hb; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875D721F8818; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.00
Message-ID: <20120328161746.25061.77299.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:17:46 -0700
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
Subject: [ippm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-metrics-08.txt> (Reporting Metrics: Different Points of View) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:17:47 -0000

The IESG has received a request from the IP Performance Metrics WG (ippm)
to consider the following document:
- 'Reporting Metrics: Different Points of View'
  <draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-metrics-08.txt> as an Informational RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-04-11. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract


   Consumers of IP network performance metrics have many different uses
   in mind.  The memo provides "long-term" reporting considerations
   (e.g, days, weeks or months, as opposed to 10 seconds), based on
   analysis of the two key audience points-of-view.  It describes how
   the audience categories affect the selection of metric parameters and
   options when seeking info that serves their needs.





The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-metrics/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-metrics/ballot/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.