Re: [ippm] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method

J Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin <ihameli@cnet.fi.uba.ar> Wed, 21 April 2021 11:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ihameli@cnet.fi.uba.ar>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570CB3A22C1 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 04:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bFUDt563ZasZ for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 04:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnet.fi.uba.ar (cnet.fi.uba.ar [157.92.58.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A09703A22BD for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 04:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cnet.fi.uba.ar (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D35F140077; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:57:01 -0300 (ART)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cnet.fi.uba.ar
Received: from cnet.fi.uba.ar ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cnet.fi.uba.ar [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HJPCwncEKk4d; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:56:50 -0300 (ART)
Received: from [192.168.0.7] (unknown [181.46.139.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cnet.fi.uba.ar (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02DC3140068; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:56:49 -0300 (ART)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: J Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin <ihameli@cnet.fi.uba.ar>
In-Reply-To: <FRYP281MB0112D09B68E15391127FE3829C4E9@FRYP281MB0112.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:56:34 -0300
Cc: tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F84F5ED4-AF05-48FA-AA69-94C7C14C3298@cnet.fi.uba.ar>
References: <0B497121-1EA9-4963-8F0C-7F55502447FE@apple.com> <FRYP281MB0112D09B68E15391127FE3829C4E9@FRYP281MB0112.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
To: Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/3WNf-uZE76vXwV84omZW36I3IOQ>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 11:57:16 -0000

Dear ippmers,

 I support this work. I think it is necessary to formalize certain metrics. 


_______________________________________________________________

Dr. Ing. José Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin
CONICET and Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Buenos Aires
Av. Paseo Colón 850 - C1063ACV - Buenos Aires - Argentina
+54 (11) 5285 0716 / 5285 0705
e-mail: ihameli@cnet.fi.uba.ar
web: http://cnet.fi.uba.ar/ignacio.alvarez-hamelin/
_______________________________________________________________



> On 14 Apr 2021, at 09:43, Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de wrote:
> 
> Hi Tommy,
>  
> as a co-author, I support re-publication.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Ruediger
>  
> Von: ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org> Im Auftrag von Tommy Pauly
> Gesendet: Samstag, 10. April 2021 01:05
> An: IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org) <ippm@ietf.org>
> Betreff: [ippm] Re-WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method
>  
> Hello IPPM,
>  
> This email starts a short re-working group last call for the revisions to draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method. During IESG review, there were several DISCUSS positions that led to refinements in the document.
>  
> The current version, -09, can be found here:
>  
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-09
>  
> You can find a diff between -06 and -09 here:
>  
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-06&url2=draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-metric-method-09
>  
> I’d suggest focusing your reviews on these changes.
>  
> Please provide feedback on whether or not you believe these changes are ready for re-publication to the IESG byMonday, April 26.
>  
> Best,
> Tommy
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm