IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Adoption call for IOAM deployment and integrity documents

Justin Iurman <justin.iurman@uliege.be> Wed, 11 August 2021 10:33 UTC

Return-Path: <justin.iurman@uliege.be>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3AB3A0F3D for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 03:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=uliege.be
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a0G2S7fwYDBJ for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 03:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be (serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be [139.165.32.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7240E3A0F3A for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 03:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be (serv470.segi.ulg.ac.be [139.165.32.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D79A2015CFE; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:33:41 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 serv108.segi.ulg.ac.be 1D79A2015CFE
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uliege.be; s=ulg20190529; t=1628678021; bh=Lt62XvIvhCwTy8ZfmZJdQwVuTZBpVlCfzMONufU8kNU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=2ZMLE3DwX4JMAzIbApx5/L2sCBWZ74WdNc1Jlv9gF9kWHnJLv32y9zUWYncdCyWc3 dXeSd0qqNIMk9roJS5+eng9XrpN92KeBKgAcAhvb2wGdRUo1UecNQVChMXe6E6e3WJ YXDkqwUMQ0H5cE7mDdvwdGBHM5jQygzH5HBA8RlshcFJPViVbkXirCSrwkcUoGmfIw sSZpGK56eGBhEWqgZ1hc4tC5mNhykZzEEg5UUP3aOH5Yz3iOEzqAzyvSczSZGH5zTr uZaWGJamY4oGnpriXIgG5QRtpbG5BAbjocPPOGnDjOfE97sIqbldM558rK6RBvyBeE mrpd7g5J9OO+g==
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1789460225475; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:33:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id EZPkraf5Ae0W; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:33:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be (mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be [139.165.32.199]) by mbx12-zne.ulg.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C8660080E86; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:33:41 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:33:40 +0200
From: Justin Iurman <justin.iurman@uliege.be>
Reply-To: Justin Iurman <justin.iurman@uliege.be>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1952984740.34797790.1628678020986.JavaMail.zimbra@uliege.be>
In-Reply-To: <69C9F697-A970-41DD-B7EF-0C17204D57AA@apple.com>
References: <69C9F697-A970-41DD-B7EF-0C17204D57AA@apple.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [81.240.24.148]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_4018 (ZimbraWebClient - FF90 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_4026)
Thread-Topic: Adoption call for IOAM deployment and integrity documents
Thread-Index: /T6zH5moZ80uHUugh7Rq7uG9RwYOdg==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/45QbzTOQCiqcV8CROTgaXpstcLU>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for IOAM deployment and integrity documents
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 10:33:54 -0000

I support the adoption of both drafts (mainly as a developer). I do believe that the deployment draft is a good summary and entry point for IOAM while the integrity draft addresses security concerns raised previously.

Thanks,
Justin


> Hello IPPM,
> 
> As discussed in our meeting last week, we will be starting an adoption call for
> two IOAM-related documents that have been raised as important dependencies
> during the IESG review of IOAM-data.
> 
> This email begins a Working Group adoption call for two documents:
> 
> Integrity of In-situ OAM Data Fields
> [ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-ippm-ioam-data-integrity/ |
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-ippm-ioam-data-integrity/ ]
> [
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-brockners-ippm-ioam-data-integrity-03.html
> |
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-brockners-ippm-ioam-data-integrity-03.html
> ]
> 
> In-situ OAM Deployment
> [ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-opsawg-ioam-deployment/ |
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-opsawg-ioam-deployment/ ]
> [
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-brockners-opsawg-ioam-deployment-03
> |
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-brockners-opsawg-ioam-deployment-03
> ]
> 
> This call will last until Wednesday, August 18 . Please reply to this email with
> your comments, and if you think these documents should be taken on by IPPM.
> 
> Best,
> Tommy & Ian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email