Re: [ippm] stamp session id

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Sun, 17 November 2019 03:30 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981DC120091; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:30:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BOUND_DIGITS_15=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g4rFxaHJKO4O; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:30:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7D1E120046; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:30:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id r7so14909543ljg.2; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:30:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AB3tbXlCYsEs4oByXSWdXXVTtAzS+KoAiKIIo+sDzak=; b=vCB6Y9PvjXvSFdpaWSotZn1qFNye2M3YAsQVhpTuuLdDXL/cbIBr7/Zwq6Q/Wus6/M nE17kG09L2hK8EZj1kvO8mAUke6a/EIS5iZgP3nlAe88qSiyxdsa6roK7zykq87pwlMF yxqGXsOH0c4l+5dP1wMnNLZwg7bW1cbHwkHaA+Ib1kEceSxHzDbQlzFHdi9GPEjtkZ6O d14yWMIdpV44H7YjZSUBXO0ZFuvrGSz9/rD416jkRaAu3I2/ySDFXLqOqry3nScdTS8O 0kBv7SRzWl0OpiMy5uIAp/2Gagtzf2To21JbN6nHG3rh3winaau+wlvWlk/X5gO5oIWx MaCQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AB3tbXlCYsEs4oByXSWdXXVTtAzS+KoAiKIIo+sDzak=; b=k+S1OOv8ToE2fw0VphZ6JJYWxgQJut3iqClSlBVHLXOm8j66QXykm1GCYp7XJCK77A xbiSQv0auYrydJlJmo9GqI/mBPBNDJpjdVMjBGmOic20j3A5oE5XuIdX9SajkD+R0ihq 9PIq+l3YMqhqRkJU9i+Kn+auZ5A8bgZx/r2B7W/d/QJqRfDD3aLo3S7mzk0Aa89Z6oS0 /3BHHUNTfB2nbgj00v1+6Pk39NCtxgWB38JBhmu5uOXHmaVzTy30ld0PoZfHHDKBIMk5 D2DoVQqoP8FD6vw6sJ4c1nNJE2PMyrUsadCu1otDBn78NA4qmK4Go3kC+WxIrlccu1eN oDbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWU1Uz/bKl0R1oLf1CA8FZBpf+K2JrItdnDVezvaAbTdKHdmjZB iDqdkxIqQI/G5ObcJ3Pa0wMVJw/U/koPQI0dckk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzO1UNozCkrWJSkBk3opbRPOlhoxFkgsFrOsb2+R1bzIoscl7bttbLLw4aFck+WxG4IsPKfkiC2SxbEapOVo64=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:998a:: with SMTP id w10mr5945116lji.66.1573961421910; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:30:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21BF0A5846@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21BF0A5846@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 11:30:11 +0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVftO4KFZg80Y0ChyXKZZ8O8Wb-oMVD4O_aFeSuX1g8Yw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ippm-stamp.authors@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-stamp.authors@ietf.org>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007175910597827379"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/46W47hNYLUjzT22kg5d_sewz8Ow>
Subject: Re: [ippm] stamp session id
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 03:30:29 -0000

Hi Tianran,
thank you for your question. You're absolutely correct. We do intend to
include the Session ID in the STAMP packet. It will be described in the
next update of draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv and will update the YANG
model accordingly.

Regards,
Greg

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 2:57 PM Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi Authors,
>
> I am looking at the stamp yang. And I see we need to configure the
> "session-id".
> But I did not see the session id in the STAMP data plane
> packet(draft-ietf-ippm-stamp).
> How to align the sender and reflector?
> Or did I miss something?
>
> Thanks,
> Tianran
>