[ippm] Notes on draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Thu, 25 April 2024 08:19 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B7BC17C8B6; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 01:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rVtgV-j0HDy7; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 01:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-x1131.google.com (mail-yw1-x1131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ED69C151997; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 01:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-x1131.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-61587aa9f4cso7702157b3.3; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 01:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1714033189; x=1714637989; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=npZIGZEPMjg9N6v8tfQGv4kLF1xeLGnmwiHf+TD0OlQ=; b=LBafxaHimDInF4io4TyJSn7C+OjayPechk9I/DIMxo1WGIdI8OTTrICgHjwT5r4yDf 8w+orkWeoUwc7WKFyfCC2MC8xuR5liTHeB0PtlheJyS86kejonDXvz+K8M5PCKGpNVnN fbl9VhvqmeV/n7a5KVeZJRpUb/Ov87GZMaUkqn6v25umeJz8rd9ZxWmNEU4/sJdbWGzA HfDWVW3rXZaAkpbDKX0mcoZjFaBo/btTPKNcbPtUaoiYtrw6ELhDH0jgWH9jge2pqGBC aJMoTt7yX1uw4qSv/FlaKFR+Xzp12UeCF/dYbBDXfmjuvaFTLNf0euZdhIy7VGv3snPk 1Brw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714033189; x=1714637989; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=npZIGZEPMjg9N6v8tfQGv4kLF1xeLGnmwiHf+TD0OlQ=; b=DI3icRFzdj8lXhOC7Ur7RQJM1m/w7yUaEx8G40tOoU9L30p5DTUXW64yFfgUs+Io3T BEdbe3M0jumGtwrg1vteUCzudZ5HDq3aDcB5ev2Tu3gHSzECs1RhnG7QisfJzCqso7Jv TsjtivsZXswN/D/3sd6EfRgz3/Rij1ZvMYazAPBYy3Q4KwYYJ54o8dwpz4FgbRv8ak3y LyeVuo3DdxkWJcOZP3NO5QkEbVbBxb3DYWbn1PJnuclMiMzrlEF3rRZGbFCy6Of18RIW m7MJrJtJdA9e7ZUIOx9ZNvSytdWJKUfRy0LhbzoeEHTmHijM9iZI3+MxFU4Who5JILBj y8Kg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVZBiQy+7tCmHlo1Mpfn6TLrtNSUWsNY8O9UXrVKt0GBf4iTtWt86Is7nMeQVBsYGN60jYPWCXk+g+VLIfYrJ0uJ7Xiqk6yX46SVNdkkrdqQ8wdDzf4Kp/s0AMQk4Y2nbjA6MzCjtWA
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzrORzzgHxTWrbw8WukzAzq9hk+meTfE+ay/6bShaZbo9TZTJka l32r67TbC5RP9UHxA/9A++o4JcUTov2lVgMKp8ypmcshRsNUaeLb0RadwtNJfQSqP5D0Y1Gz9cf v7XOr5OxiskbxsI/e0/C3IR1WWJNA2kbkdBs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IELQ0Shiu51fp3OfGuDZ+UHYHdD1B+LE091vtH6bMaYSCE+rrHmkyb/JcxBhad3IldwtipJhr1aiAimp0K/gug=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:6ac9:b0:615:39fb:ec with SMTP id ij9-20020a05690c6ac900b0061539fb00ecmr5062223ywb.50.1714033189021; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 01:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:19:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmWZY-p6XyYHZDHyvGou5De8iWQ20seTDjU8J6qiyvW1VQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>, draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005d74250616e77373"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/68mXbrjyjPNYH-IU0Fo4qZnO7HY>
Subject: [ippm] Notes on draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 08:19:50 -0000
Dear, Authors et al., thank you for your continued work on the Alternate Marking method. In my opinion, draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark provides an essential IEs making the use of IPFIX operationally viable option for the Alternate Marking method. While I've read the document, it seems that its current track, Informational, may not be consistent with the request for specific actions from IANA. Could it be that the Standard track is more appropriate for the draft? Regards, Greg
- [ippm] Notes on draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark Greg Mirsky
- Re: [ippm] Notes on draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-ma… Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [ippm] [OPSAWG] Notes on draft-gfz-opsawg-ipf… Alex Huang Feng
- Re: [ippm] [OPSAWG] Notes on draft-gfz-opsawg-ipf… Giuseppe Fioccola