Re: [ippm] [IPv6] IOAM, iOAM, and oOAM abbreviations

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 13 December 2023 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64589C14F5F1; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:13:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.807
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.807 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tEnWPmPNrUX6; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:13:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EB4FC14F5E4; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:13:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9501800D; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:13:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qbwavsoKYxEr; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:13:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460A61800C; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:13:39 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1702476819; bh=UZ7c2/WE95FIZY8DPcV9xEnKwsS1pubnHVntmGLLsgk=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=vcdiExHq2EGT6MMXZmWyD7vYdszU0ZLmUxXDEpl6VA/W7d2RhwagyTj4v8XQOS3I3 aTe2JU9NDimvk062TzWnTl3/CS9SBzTWIZPEgVubULOriz/MUqivReN0/rrQDnxTP1 Z+EPDvyO17QbdYip2msKnimPM/3ldf1e/o6JbJ3+dEyY4j3LUv2adCYw+v0iMCjvPX XlaiUGnjj2TkOO7uQN2mrs3tmlTYj7biZiIHIqSqt5HvyVj2xQU+bSOcN+G0EZx3r6 PqIcETX8PlpQYETmi87zTbjfvQ8i+PvdLGvuShVa9shGmRbfquRuTujvo7QglnCVSV IhQfKDO1IZkhA==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E574133; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:13:39 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
cc: DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>, Pascal Thubert <pascal.thubert@gmail.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmU=CKb+oieBwqwn=QkprayA_8KWeTL3XTgioNqw8KTZ+g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+RyBmU=CKb+oieBwqwn=QkprayA_8KWeTL3XTgioNqw8KTZ+g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:13:39 -0500
Message-ID: <7381.1702476819@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/6f-Tis_Cfw1Fmrqt2-bFgsgssps>
Subject: Re: [ippm] [IPv6] IOAM, iOAM, and oOAM abbreviations
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:13:46 -0000

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
    >    - Do you see the benefit of introducing two new abbreviations for
    > in-band OAM and out-of-band OAM?

Yes.

    > - Which set of abbreviations
    > (iOAM/oOAM vs. inb-OAM/oob-OAM) do you prefer for being used in IETF?
    > - Or would you propose another set of abbreviations?

inb-OAM, oob-OAM.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide