IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ippm] draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-cos-ext

xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Wed, 09 April 2025 02:46 UTC

Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: ippm@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ippm@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8211E195900B for <ippm@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Apr 2025 19:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EJX4iA-Ttmtp for <ippm@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Apr 2025 19:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD36B1959000 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Apr 2025 19:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.251.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4ZXS4s0hLvz8R03d for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2025 10:46:21 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxct.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4ZXS4G75Yhz4xVcw; Wed, 9 Apr 2025 10:45:50 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njb2app07.zte.com.cn ([10.55.22.95]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 5392jgwq035429; Wed, 9 Apr 2025 10:45:42 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njb2app05[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Wed, 9 Apr 2025 10:45:44 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 10:45:44 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afd67f5df58520-1ec37
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <2025040910454420474DCzi1rrqdme3uhV5xxD@zte.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: gregimirsky@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 5392jgwq035429
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 67F5DF7D.000/4ZXS4s0hLvz8R03d
Message-ID-Hash: SXZESDW4Z5DGQPX3U33A62UCS2KSTE43
X-Message-ID-Hash: SXZESDW4Z5DGQPX3U33A62UCS2KSTE43
X-MailFrom: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ippm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [ippm] draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-cos-ext
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/6h8-wYaVr50nOcXZ--A2F7zxjYI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ippm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ippm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ippm-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Greg,

Thank you for the concise and well-written draft.
I like the idea of making the new CoS TLV backward compatible with the existing CoS TLV defined in Section 4.4 of RFC 8972.
While reading the substantial part on the new definition of existing RP field and the new added REC field, I believe it's helpful to explain the existing definition of RP field here, in addition to the new definition. Furthermore, a new section explaining the backward compatibility, like Section 4.6 of RFC 8762, may make the advantages of this kind design more clear.

Best Regards,
Xiao Min

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status