[ippm] 答复: Call for adoption of PM on LAG

gongliyan <gongliyan@chinamobile.com> Wed, 07 September 2022 09:06 UTC

Return-Path: <gongliyan@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68955C1524B8 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 02:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.906
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aMkj2pbYq7XT for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 02:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta1.chinamobile.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC10C14CF10 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 02:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee463185f0aced-e8eb0; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 17:06:19 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee463185f0aced-e8eb0
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from LAPTOP5GS3BPC8 (unknown[]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvrnew10-12035 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2f0363185f098e9-8eaf5; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 17:06:19 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2f0363185f098e9-8eaf5
From: gongliyan <gongliyan@chinamobile.com>
To: 'Marcus Ihlar' <marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, 'IETF IPPM WG' <ippm@ietf.org>
References: <AM0PR07MB4131BFFD304468FA4CCD0484E27B9@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB4131BFFD304468FA4CCD0484E27B9@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2022 17:05:59 +0800
Message-ID: <000001d8c299$17de5060$479af120$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01D8C2DC.26019060"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AQL9zkW5z9chr3qE85k8DkVuSpsYzKuJkTpg
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/7LjQvFDIcFqUSMIKuj2otvwfQ4M>
Subject: [ippm] 答复: Call for adoption of PM on LAG
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2022 09:06:27 -0000

Hi WG,

I support the adoption. It is necessary to support performance measurement on every member link of  a Link Aggregation Group (LAG), and these two drafts propose valuable extension.


Best Regards,




发件人: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Marcus Ihlar
发送时间: 2022年9月2日 00:44
收件人: IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)
主题: [ippm] Call for adoption of PM on LAG


Hello IPPM,

This email starts an adoption call in the IPPM working group for the draft-li-ippm-stamp-on-lag and draft-li-ippm-otwamp-on-lag documents. These documents extend STAMP, OWAMP and TWAMP to support performance measurements on member links of a Link Aggregation Group.


The first draft specifies an extension to STAMP and can be found here:




The second draft specifies extensions to OWAMP and TWAMP and can be found here:




Please reply to this email by Thursday September 15, to indicate whether you support adoption of these documents.



Marcus & Tommy