Re: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-yang

Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com> Thu, 02 November 2023 11:39 UTC

Return-Path: <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F819C1519A3 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 04:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.204
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.204 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jwNFFWHgkxVY for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 04:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3859C151993 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 04:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frapeml100007.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4SLhd41bYjz6J9ds; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 19:35:20 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.219) by frapeml100007.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.133) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 12:39:23 +0100
Received: from frapeml500006.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.219]) by frapeml500006.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.219]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.031; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 12:39:23 +0100
From: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
To: Marcus Ihlar <marcus.ihlar=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-yang
Thread-Index: AdoGljSR2AbkfCTDS2Krl6mLORqkGQG6L/Yw
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 11:39:23 +0000
Message-ID: <e0d18fa64d4f44d7bf5121481688f70f@huawei.com>
References: <AM0PR07MB4131B9E1E1B099D00A0B122EE2DFA@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB4131B9E1E1B099D00A0B122EE2DFA@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.145.154]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_e0d18fa64d4f44d7bf5121481688f70fhuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/8H5qyfWUoE___2nhHa1dCJwijrs>
Subject: Re: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-yang
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2023 11:39:27 -0000

Dear All,
I have read the draft and I think it is ready to progress.
I also want to highlight that draft-gfz-ippm-alt-mark-yang follows a similar structure for the YANG model, in order to consolidate it for the on-path telemetry methods defined in IPPM.

Best Regards,

Giuseppe

From: ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Marcus Ihlar
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 6:22 PM
To: IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org) <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-yang


Hello IPPM,

This email starts a Working Group Last Call for " A YANG Data Model for In-Situ OAM”, draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-yang.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-yang/
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-yang-09.html

Please review the document and send your comments in response to this email, along with whether you think the document is ready to progress.

Please send your reviews and feedback by Friday, November 10.

BR,
Marcus & Tommy