Re: [ippm] Review on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-06

"Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" <fbrockne@cisco.com> Wed, 11 September 2019 09:52 UTC

Return-Path: <fbrockne@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7DC120849; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 02:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=VR4t1nbh; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=afifgkLY
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8brJs7OfauEv; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 02:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6880112084D; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 02:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2195; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1568195564; x=1569405164; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=p05UydsReSqXhkpGAKUMRqaTjFX0UnENzbjIQ4Ags20=; b=VR4t1nbhGLtX3cLzfy0ticja+858Cnn6Vfriakk7+GYPndFNw+jXU6EM ERUkqRWwxb9JOqyqsNXMPwqTaUeTGhWERCk7XRO773RAMC4fR+0HidUwd y8MBdff4ssDmz/KpZddkykH/U1iePWFwhQ92JXAsZ6Xz9GMN7Y04HrS9a 8=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3Atk/sZR3TdFqQyq/0smDT+zVfbzU7u7jyIg8e44?= =?us-ascii?q?YmjLQLaKm44pD+JxKGt+51ggrPWoPWo7JfhuzavrqoeFRI4I3J8RVgOIdJSw?= =?us-ascii?q?dDjMwXmwI6B8vQB0fhK/XpaSESF8VZX1gj9Ha+YgBY?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BOAAAZw3hd/5xdJa1lHAEBAQQBAQc?= =?us-ascii?q?EAQGBUwcBAQsBgURQA21WIAQLKgqHXgOEUoYpTYIPDJdkgS4UgRADVAkBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?MAQEjCgIBAYQ/AoJTIzQJDgIDCQEBBAEBAQIBBgRthS4MhUoBAQEBAxIoBgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BOAsEAgEIEQQBAR8QMh0IAQEEARIIGoMBgWoDHQECDJ4wAoE4iGGCJYJ9AQE?= =?us-ascii?q?FgTIBg1AYghYDBoE0AYt3GIFAP4ERRoJMPoF7ZgKBKTqDO4ImrEsKgiGHAYU?= =?us-ascii?q?NiQSCNIdAjTuBW41/iASQagIEAgQFAg4BAQWBUjiBWHAVgyeCQoNyhRSBZYN?= =?us-ascii?q?acwGBKI1cAYEiAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,493,1559520000"; d="scan'208";a="623687176"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 11 Sep 2019 09:52:43 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com (xch-rcd-012.cisco.com [173.37.102.22]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x8B9qhFp018521 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:52:43 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-RCD-012.cisco.com (173.37.102.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 04:52:42 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 04:52:42 -0500
Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 05:52:42 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PCZhxd/mCBrYGDQLEw6Np2Ug21YfM9+m726Eo5K8uQkKDmpqWwZWLzS7pqeRZiTPsLRAE+oh61xkYUFozxCkiepW9AzZ2w0aMHaAxcMUP6lWRIWHfEIWNOhnaURc9K9j1L5S9YjAbvNwKCgEgQId9lBvA0XGDEvU0zVWIxVootol9VO8Svwqwi572dMXANSESRRMFR+ivVDyitIuxkBGAqiFbvkc9bxz9hJTw+qzGunOTowP3FjpIOoN1VH8pNNgr9AKc7nv53XVjoU/xc/8OuQXyHPO60BiiKHInO9/jK/EiELRZIsxYZAgV3yjsVQtHo1AU6wXx0vmD6/BnuDxfQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=p05UydsReSqXhkpGAKUMRqaTjFX0UnENzbjIQ4Ags20=; b=K/nlsCktWZp6TN5mSp25Amp3YnqacwmeNQicjR4lFwUZbwoLfpEKwW6f8ZSyrC0fCHVNF/STiBQVO9hi8vEcWUwqTz7tyk9kvNH+2lK6F/doG6M8r5elU7LkrYJc8uif1t1U+yvXg/tLuSFk+iBimAZPwzRIW6KoANo+wsr3KMDykwBGY+gEu+B0HnIfkcA+trJw5XelnZBnZrR3qkpd01hB1syE7zHkvFqyJ/avMQU35eA74vobkjCVYooxg7jnnUcwrqDc/QNHD8W0d+a/41bw/EoVMmxzeqiVtNw7C+PXyzA2MIsynuK87QHYHV+9wIDM9JninsRruyRVda6eAw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=p05UydsReSqXhkpGAKUMRqaTjFX0UnENzbjIQ4Ags20=; b=afifgkLYxMnhfmNQxHKhzh93XpChm/AsBHp+B2+MxeZj6kYRLcCfxVc+cCQMlKoH+XsJZp4jclyd01g/CU84Sbx4A+OXKbF3jCDghIxtDVSee+LVyfAdL4dkg/CsqC2JuPvyOTGPpqSmS0uPAxGEBzVOi3iP1pOCKKrRuaO/GVQ=
Received: from DM6PR11MB2588.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.176.99.18) by DM6PR11MB3706.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.231.156) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2241.14; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:52:40 +0000
Received: from DM6PR11MB2588.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2db4:d3:b301:3395]) by DM6PR11MB2588.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::2db4:d3:b301:3395%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2220.022; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:52:40 +0000
From: "Frank Brockners (fbrockne)" <fbrockne@cisco.com>
To: Haoyu Song <haoyu.song@futurewei.com>, "draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data@ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Review on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-06
Thread-Index: AdVRaVuwRvhTeI2VTDyRJBkRgBuuOwAPCiFABE81OsABaPFTMA==
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:52:40 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB25885AA2526FBB85E57BD533DAB10@DM6PR11MB2588.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MN2PR13MB3582D134144C09AEB4A2AFBF9AD30@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <SN6PR11MB25894B96CD73BB957EB57E33DAD20@SN6PR11MB2589.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR11MB2584B2CFE89493F8F7B9D8A9DAB80@BYAPR11MB2584.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB2584B2CFE89493F8F7B9D8A9DAB80@BYAPR11MB2584.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=fbrockne@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.220.41]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5b05d5c1-282c-47f2-cefd-08d7369dc8f3
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:DM6PR11MB3706;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR11MB3706:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR11MB3706C38F1C156BE3726A8AABDAB10@DM6PR11MB3706.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0157DEB61B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(366004)(39860400002)(346002)(376002)(396003)(136003)(189003)(199004)(13464003)(229853002)(305945005)(6116002)(3846002)(53936002)(6306002)(2501003)(55016002)(6246003)(11346002)(186003)(446003)(71200400001)(71190400001)(476003)(486006)(9686003)(110136005)(66066001)(256004)(86362001)(99286004)(7696005)(14444005)(8676002)(81166006)(76176011)(14454004)(8936002)(26005)(316002)(25786009)(76116006)(64756008)(66446008)(66556008)(2906002)(7736002)(66946007)(6436002)(6506007)(81156014)(5660300002)(53546011)(74316002)(478600001)(966005)(33656002)(52536014)(102836004)(66476007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM6PR11MB3706; H:DM6PR11MB2588.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 1wH2XtEg4Oi+FkPrvbgZNbr/QS2Up/SxsJQ49F9QuMzNhQHr7hmy8p424RxtsWdjdapJAY09vNEysfVM7OkGZijUq+A4RoIMNIfJJezhlgpGqgCpNNsj18yattAGxnDt050/Nq5O7WD2IKfV1w7QlGSVxaQ1rBPM5v5SO7oWAonU4Dc9c1wS4wYFNzV3jC+PpyfkK6mvzZLJCpi/jpvU/m3ubKAn5wTl7U9NkVVIcMoJ6Nq2isZoiBkSs53Aqi2WMhwAhmpcdOL0fKy82vk/Fz2jCwv3MSUuJB/702p4B8mid0Z8ruWlxt2aKA4ptCnUwlRZpaljUV3+qOl6v63rAlkIrZsANjO/xYdI5eMGwO9Ff08C6XhSwgkyeWZ8WI1e29pBPe+NDb6FwDUklA39S5aaLkyLcq6tHKQGxDupgLc=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5b05d5c1-282c-47f2-cefd-08d7369dc8f3
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Sep 2019 09:52:40.4152 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: dXZWquO+We6XJnRbbzM/i79CstxvkafFNI/XtM9M55DfEY43UVy9KpqvwgBPLFhgpJ+UrRRejIt/R7vtZiflRw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR11MB3706
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.22, xch-rcd-012.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/8MORtcvctzU3sxWXXM-B1-bCViQ>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Review on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-06
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:52:48 -0000

Thanks again for the review and comments. The most recent version - which includes the below mentioned pull request - is now available as -07:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-07.txt

Can we consider this one ready for WGLC?

Thanks, Frank


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
> Sent: Mittwoch, 4. September 2019 07:37
> To: 'Haoyu Song' <haoyu.song@futurewei.com>om>; 'draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-
> data@ietf.org' <draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data@ietf.org>rg>; 'IETF IPPM WG'
> <ippm@ietf.org>rg>; 'Tom Herbert' <tom@herbertland.com>
> Subject: RE: [ippm] Review on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-06
> 
> 
> Thanks again detailed comments (special thanks to Tom and Haoyu).
> There is a new pull request available which reflect these comments:
> https://github.com/inband-oam/ietf/pull/133. Please review.
> I'm hoping to get it merged by the end of this week.
> 
> Thanks, Frank
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
> > Sent: Dienstag, 13. August 2019 09:08
> > To: Haoyu Song <haoyu.song@futurewei.com>om>; draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-
> > data@ietf.org; IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
> > Subject: RE: [ippm] Review on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-06
> >
> > Hi Haoyu,
> >
> > Thanks for your comments. They key point you raise is consistent
> > nomenclature
> > - which we definitively need to address in the next revision. Not
> > uncommon for a document with many different authors - but now is
> > indeed the time to tidy things up and get the house in order.
> >
> > Thanks again, Frank
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Haoyu Song <haoyu.song@futurewei.com>
> > > Sent: Dienstag, 13. August 2019 02:00
> > > To: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data@ietf.org; IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
> > > Subject: [ippm] Review on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-06
> > >
> > > Dear IOAM data authors and IPPM WG,
> > >
> > > To sync up with the latest, I reread the draft and gave it a full review.
> > > Some questions, comments, and suggestions are marked in the document.
> > > Hopefully this can help to tighten the draft.
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Haoyu
> > >