Re: [ippm] IPR Call regarding draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Thu, 03 August 2017 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91552131FE7; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 10:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TNPR0bG8Om4u; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 10:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x232.google.com (mail-qt0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 375D6131EDB; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 10:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x232.google.com with SMTP id a18so12116718qta.0; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 10:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3I4MuEFM6EE4cYvXMQNDuM9DdFeNM/02aoBDr9yJod8=; b=Cr/2Qsn3S6X24Ho0UEl5C0D+nEqkNplv9oNUHTV/BHc2JKcgrVtXGvXtbYobBNCVOp k1Psok6OKqUQ6bwY94hjuP7QytalTiLEin8ZFmvu0pGsfwy40GLF0tzpc3JptzXn4bhm UvmizF58ypD1p0xrALNXaYW93cGF+mhda+4WzzIBFXgJiwZlLR4bkSSihxase5rShFCY tbcPhIdKTSa+HEVTesRQy2tDwU5JvGwCb0SftyGXqgW04r6xU8F4qEKBFX+j5q0f/2mh DtQmtyuCC2ALB7pICq8+TIHU9kWxt3vKz/uhWKAIEy4nYfAC+Zwt4ABes8biuyvMxWRP otkA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3I4MuEFM6EE4cYvXMQNDuM9DdFeNM/02aoBDr9yJod8=; b=agQotf6hqDu4xbo8rsb/7LrzSVOOHXL4k0kJKFirIWQLQEv16fRMAUdMV5Tn3+IXu/ LGXuDYgq6xA+vscNOYd27HSgN2jJf7HiXMzw1YXFY8imDvGQaqS9bR9BB/WyEuF021kM wyfHmiMENUErzJ2Sr+wUmYuuwkM+4hIqwzRkwCdUAw6TXEkGmdvIZpUaVzmiUByu2U7I QXYvyozUq4EG/jqJIKOUtVepDYt73Bffng9WALkkzTjeWkeitxaczhMAQXiSQa7rbG5n Hal2yWp1d8OWJjcNomivvNT3mQCUM97bDercrw49nxCsXAEn4PmUVft8jVGDC6ujYW33 kEhw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113r+F4aohJ9uGMdgG813P5VAie7d2MuqVqFJYF7fPGm4p2/uWHb T8bz2tD0u/QUfzAk7Vcp23RD4WIP+g==
X-Received: by 10.200.37.21 with SMTP id 21mr3475775qtm.85.1501782853214; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 10:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.88.72 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 10:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ED9E6D07-FFCF-4756-A2D8-58CC859B8D4E@cisco.com>
References: <ED9E6D07-FFCF-4756-A2D8-58CC859B8D4E@cisco.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 10:54:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVufOtBK66bv70hO1=ssHGF1jeKjbZ=ghrFmKG+c2+4VQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark@ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114078d27ee7050555dd1106"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/8QYOComYiywgvhim-kkL6ttQw0M>
Subject: Re: [ippm] IPR Call regarding draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 17:54:41 -0000

Hi,
I am not aware of any related to this draft IPR other than already
disclosed.

Regards,
Greg

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:31 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <
cpignata@cisco.com> wrote:

> Dear IPPM,
>
> This email starts an IPR call on draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-06, in
> preparation to document advancement.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-06?
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see
> RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> There is one IPR disclosure filed directly against this
> draft-tempia-ippm-p3m:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2557/
>
> _Action_:
>
> If you are listed as a document author, editor, or contributor please
> respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant IPR. These responses are needed for the shepherd questionnaire.
>
> If you are on the IPPM WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> This poll will run for a week, or until all contributors respond.
>
> Thanks!
>
> —
> Carlos Pignataro, carlos@cisco.com
>
> *“Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself
> sound more photosynthesis."*
>
>