[ippm] Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Thu, 25 July 2019 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDE712013B; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 10:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id deF3D58dVo2R; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 10:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com (mail-lj1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B89112012B; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 10:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id v18so48698594ljh.6; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 10:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=VQ7JhDLsU1x2BTpZHvabZ9hdu7tThe4x9++Oq14OPrc=; b=sQE69e3xJ3T+yrvCaamJF0H94IJnsZNgEVGOazLrq9CXlZMOgrcUC7CpwZ/xEQuqD8 c7c/eWNTmTSj85wAmS1QfwclYdK0Q6W2tabkpzz/waqIAHbYK6u0kdDkEOHovsVsXRkB q+GllpWmUsOVp2VEtag+6XRBXhDdYpt2Rgwf4b9IuBMT+YWvz6+oOVc5b3jkhstsREiw RQMeDmmgNgY3y6C6ldw/fEVKtrXMgSOu0X3il2WKBnzWr6S4t8/3NM/qK+ws7tkLZv2H EMgQ6G3mJlKx5EqqtbsaH3WAwXrs0YtQT3/1rUuI7Zx5asPA7h6RTFH4eb+WWtVXKM20 Nk8w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=VQ7JhDLsU1x2BTpZHvabZ9hdu7tThe4x9++Oq14OPrc=; b=JiPd10dsyCcfLvbt3UVCzdnb1dEi+UABchTvwq+S7gglly1o8X3WaKDTIi43vRGY3u +K5iVbc8F060Yj2HFjiu/cq/Bh5fWB9PGXM9r50JaPheMrhYr+vueU8/UypLmhaEqF8n McVXmb1Me5t4HT/wwcThOzbYy0t7lo3sU3gei9zLoNgneqBejABUyjpTzAwkQoyszWe2 pICzjFYXtEB6Qa9bBvnFlB5ya5JlQc5vtZ0V4TWA48KAmkXS71RCqF/AGer0CVZAG7T2 BfuZAE0UO7Nn7ynKJgNodOnFgU5/LpyliY/Xg5T2pRlwJhSTkNw4dteWKQ634GXPyC46 q/CA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWLhy94kVZO8fg4M+gfJsZe+NN3khtE73SgIWKe+Kj981meMXfB jaoNsQfbP4KzL5/Zp5oVgzpPHKu7KynqNmT2ArxTq5a3
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyZDKsPfpvyoD90bAAqN0pIpS8h5Jdcnu3B9/CxLiYFf+6uYkx03Zcst3c6Ik33e/K4Ykd2UJZblhts3ASIpJU=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7614:: with SMTP id r20mr47548079ljc.42.1564074964091; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 10:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:15:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVnkMFEQv=Hr3y9OD09+_vocHRgnGQnLwEVO=yuTcptEQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a30647058e8494af"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/8RTPfMvv2ADrHSQ9zI1oYLe8aGU>
Subject: [ippm] Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 17:16:09 -0000

Dear Chairs, et al.,
I appreciate that editors of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data followed on the
decision of the WG reached at the meeting in Prague to extract material not
directly related to the definition of iOAM data elements from the document.
The new draft was presented earlier this week and generated many comments.
I feel that it would be right to discuss the draft and its relevance to the
charter of the IPPM WG before starting WG adoption poll.

Regards,
Greg