[ippm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04.txt> (Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on the Standards Track) to Informational RFC
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Thu, 13 February 2014 16:13 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1EE31A033C; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:13:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6jUu6puAPWwB; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:13:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F641A02AC; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:13:29 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.0.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Sender: iesg-secretary@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140213161328.21967.14527.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:13:28 -0800
Cc: ippm@ietf.org
Subject: [ippm] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04.txt> (Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on the Standards Track) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:13:35 -0000
The IESG has received a request from the IP Performance Metrics WG (ippm) to consider the following document: - 'Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on the Standards Track' <draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04.txt> as Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2014-02-27. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This memo proposes to advance a performance metric RFC along the standards track, specifically RFC 2680 on One-way Loss Metrics. Observing that the metric definitions themselves should be the primary focus rather than the implementations of metrics, this memo describes the test procedures to evaluate specific metric requirement clauses to determine if the requirement has been interpreted and implemented as intended. Two completely independent implementations have been tested against the key specifications of RFC 2680. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.